Question of Presence and Viability of Architectural Type as a Legal Rule in Croatian Urban Planning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31522/p.32.2(68).6Keywords:
architectural type, legal rule, urban planningAbstract
“Type” can serve as a positive legal term in physical planning and a review of the literature clarifies its specific meaning, distinguishing it from its colloquial usage, where it is often confused with “class.” In architectural theory, the meaning of “type” is rooted in concepts of similarity and indeterminacy, which parallels its meaning in legal theory, where it stands in contrast to the identity and determinacy associated with “class.” This distinction establishes a fundamental limitation on the usability of “type” in legal regulation: the challenge of determining the meaning of a “type” in concrete situations, leading to potential legal uncertainty. An analysis of how the class of singlefamily houses is regulated in Croatian urban development plans reveals that “type” is typically used only as a general requirement for the conformity of building appearances with the surrounding built environment. Rather than relying on “type,” the planning rules predominantly focus on objectively determinable quantitative values assigned to specific building classes.
References
Alexy, R. (2019) Theorie der juristischen Argumentation: die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Anderson, S. (1982) „Types and Conventions in Time: Toward a History for the Duration and
Change of Artifacts“, Perspecta, 18, pp. 108-117. https://doi.org/10.2307/1567037
Bandini, M. (1984) „Typology as a form of convention“, AA Files, 6, pp. 73-82.
Caniggia, G. and Maffei, G.L. (1995) Tipología de la edificación: Estructura del espacio antropico. Madrid: Celeste Ediciones.
Carlizzi, G. (2016) „Tipo normativo ed ermeneutica penale. Profili storico-concettuali e prospettive teorico-pratiche“, Ars interpretandi, 21(2), pp. 91-108.
Durand, J.L.N. (1823) Précis des leçons d’architecture, données à l’école royale polytechnique. Paris.
Forty, A. (2004) Words and buildings: A vocabulary of modern architecture. London: Thames & Hudson.
Habraken, N.J. (2000) The structure of the ordinary: Form and control in the built environment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jacoby, S. (2013) The reasoning of architecture - Type and the problem of historicity. Ph.D. dissertation. Technische Universität Berlin, Fakultät VI - Planen Bauen Umwelt. Available at: https://d-nb.info/103649621X/34 [Accessed: 11. 5. 2024.]
Kelsen, H. (2015) Opća teorija normi. Zagreb: Naklada Breza.
Kokert, J. (1995) Der Begriff des Typus bei Karl Larenz. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
Kropf, K. (2017). The Handbook of Urban Morphology. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118747711
Kuhlen, L. (1977) Typuskonzeptionen in der Rechtstheorie. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-43961-4
Larenz, K. (1992) Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft. 2nd study edition. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08710-7
Lendi, M. (1995) Grundriß einer Theorie der Raumplanung: Einleitung in die raumplanerische Problematik. 2nd edition. Zürich: vdf.
Madrazo, L. (1995) The Concept of Type in Architecture: An Inquiry into the Nature of Architectural Form. Ph.D. dissertation. ETH, Zürich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-001503629
Martín Hernández, M.J. (1984) La tipología en arquitectura. Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Departamento de arte, ciudad y territorio. Available at: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/bitstream/10553/1914/1/779.pdf [Accessed: 2. 10. 2024.]
Meninato, P. (2018) Unexpected Affinities: The History of Type in Architectural Project from Laugier to Duchamp. New York, Abingdon: Routledge.
Milotić, I. and Peranić, D. (2015) Nomotehnika: Izrada općih akata s praktičnim primjerima. Zagreb: RRiF plus.
Moneo, R. (1978) „On typology“, Oppositions, 13, pp. 22-45.
Müller, F. (1996) Discours de la méthode juridique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Oechslin, W. (1986) „Premises for the Resumption of the Discussion of Typology“, Assemblage, 1, pp. 37-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3171053
Panerai, P.; Depaule, J.-C., and Demorgon, M. (2005) Analyse urbaine. Marseille: Éditions Parenthèses.
Perić, B. (1994) Struktura prava. 12th edition. Zagreb: Informator.
PPP: Pravilnik o prostornim planovima. (2023) Republika Hrvatska. Narodne novine, 152/2023.
Raith, E. (2000) Stadtmorphologie: Annäherungen, Umsetzungen, Aussichten. Wien, New York: Springer.
Seoane, J.A. (2002) „En torno a la noción de ‘tipo’. Una proyección metodológica del concepto de derecho de Arthur Kaufmann“, Persona y Derecho, 47, pp. 325-360. https://doi.org/10.15581/011.31904
Strache, K-H. (1968) Das Denken in Standards: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Typologik. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-42199-2
Visković, N. (1989) Jezik prava. Zagreb: Naprijed.
ZoG: Zakon o gradnji (2013) Republika Hrvatska.
Narodne novine, 153/2013, 20/2017, 114/2018, 39/2019, 125/2019.
ZPU: Zakon o prostornom uređenju (2013) Republika Hrvatska. Narodne novine, 153/2013, 65/2017, 114/2018, 39/2019, 98/2019, 67/2023. English translation available at: https://mpgi.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/dokumenti/Propisi/Physical_Planning_Act.pdf [Accessed: 23. 10. 2024.]
Žagar, A. (2018) „Zaštita prava vlasništva u postupcima provedbe prostornih planova“,
Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, 39(1), pp. 687-708. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.1.23
*** n.d. Tip. In: Hrvatska enciklopedija [online]. Available at: https://www.enciklopedija.hr/clanak/tip [Accessed: 23. 10. 2024.]
*** n.d. Tip. In: Hrvatski jezični portal [online]. Available at: https://hjp.znanje.hr/index.php?show=search_by_id&id=f19nXRV4&keyword=tip [Accessed: 23. 10. 2024.]
*** n.d. Tipo. In: Diccionário de la lengua española [online]. Available at: https://dle.rae.es/tipo [Accessed: 23. 10. 2024.]
*** n.d. Type. In: Cambridge Dictionary [online]. Available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/type [Accessed: 23. 10. 2024.]
*** n.d. Type. In: Le dictionnaire de français Larousse [online]. Available at: https://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/type/ [Accessed: 23. 10. 2024.]
*** n.d. Type. In: Merriam-Webster Dictionary [online]. Available at: https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/type [Accessed: 23.10. 2024.]
*** n.d. Typus. In: Duden [online]. Available at: https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Typus [Accessed: 23. 10. 2024.]
Planning documentation
Grad Bjelovar (2014) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja „Radničko naselje”. Službeni glasnik Grada Bjelovara, br. 6/14.
Grad Duga Resa (2023) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja grada Duge Rese. Službeni glasnik Grada Duge Rese, br. 5/08, 8/12, 8/20, 1/21, 9/23.
Grad Đurđevac (2017) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja grada Đurđevca (pročišćeni tekst). Službene novine Grada Đurđevca, br. 6a/17.
Grad Gospić (2022) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja naselja Gospić - UPU 1 (pročišćeni tekst Odredbi za provedbu). Službeni vjesnik Grada Gospića, br. 11/22.
Grad Korčula (2020) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja „Tri Žala 1”. Službeni glasnik Grada Korčule, br. 2/20.
Grad Kutjevo (2020) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja Grada Kutjeva. Službeni glasnik Grada Kutjeva, br. 2/20.
Grad Novalja (2019) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja dijela građevinskog područja Dubac-Varsan koji je planiran za urbanu sanaciju. Županijski glasnik Ličko-senjske županije, br. 12/19.
Grad Petrinja (2016) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja Mlinski kamen u naselju Brest Pokupski (UPU-19). Službeni vjesnik Grada Petrinje, br. 48/16.
Grad Pula (2015) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja „Štinjan”. Službene novine Grada Pule, br. 11/15.
Grad Vukovar (2016) Urbanistički plan uređenja „Šire središte grada” (UPU-1) („Službeni
vjesnik Grada Vukovara” br. 10/11 i 13/16). Službeni vjesnik Grada Vukovara, br. 14/16.
Grad Zadar (2020) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja predio „Gornji Bilig”. Glasnik Grada Zadra, br. 2/20.
Grad Zagreb (2015) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja Hrvatski Leskovac - središnji dio naselja (pročišćeni tekst). Službeni glasnik Grada Zagreba, br. 25/15.
Općina Belica (2016) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja područja „Mostišće” u Belici. Službeni glasnik Međimurske županije, br. 8/16.
Općina Bistra (2016) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja „Odvojak ulice Ante Kovačića”. Službeni glasnik Općine Bistra, br. 3/16.
Općina Kostrena (2015) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja građevinskog područja naselja N-4. Službene novine Primorsko- goranske županije, br. 8/15.
Općina Krapinske Toplice (2019) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja naselja Krapinske Toplice i Klokovec, pročišćeni tekst. Službeni glasnik Krapinsko-zagorske županije, br. 16/19.
Općina Murter - Kornati (2019) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja Lajci 2. Službeni glasnik Općine Murter - Kornati, br. 4/19.
Općina Petrijevci (2004) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja naselja Petrijevci. Službeni glasnik Općine Petrijevci, br. 6/04, 4/08, 7/18.
Općina Vidovec (2017) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja (UPU) Poslovno- stambene zone Vidovec. Službeni vjesnik Varaždinske županije, br. 57/17.
Općina Vinodolska općina (2018) Odluka o donošenju Urbanistički plan uređenja dijela građevinskog područja naselja Podgori (dio NA1-53). Službene novine Primorsko-goranske županije, br. 29/18.
Općina Zagvozd (2017) Odluka o donošenju Urbanističkog plana uređenja UPU 2 Zagvozd centar. Službeni glasnik Općine Zagvozd, br. 2/17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ante Senjanović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 authors and journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In agreeing this form, you certify that:
- You read the ethical codex of the PROSTOR available at journal web.
- You submitted work is your original work, and has not previously been published and does not include any form of plagiarism.
- You own copyright in the submitted work, and are therefore permitted to assign the licence to publish to PROSTOR.
- Your submitted work contains no violation of any existing copyright or other third party right or any material of an obscene, libellous or otherwise unlawful nature.
- You have obtained permission for and acknowledged the source of any illustrations, diagrams or other material included in the work of which you are not the copyright owner.
- You have taken due care to ensure the accuracy of the work, and that, to the best of your knowledge, there are no false statements made within it.
- All co-authors of this submitted work are aware of, and in agreement with, the terms of this licence and that the submitted manuscript has been approved by these authors.
