Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Pregledni rad

https://doi.org/10.17113/ftb.61.03.23.8013

Minimal Processing Technologies for Production and Preservation of Tailor-Made Foods§

Daniel Berdejo orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5053-8309 ; Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA (UNIZAR), C. de Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Diego García-Gonzalo orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7629-8101 ; Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA (UNIZAR), C. de Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Nadia Oulahal orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6965-7487 ; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), ISARA Lyon, BioDyMIA Research Unit, Technopole Alimentec, 155 rue Henri de Boissieu, 01000 Bourg en Bresse, France
Rositsa Denkova-Kostova ; University of Food Technologies (UFT), 26 Maritza boulevard, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Vesela Shopska orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4492-5094 ; University of Food Technologies (UFT), 26 Maritza boulevard, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Georgi Kostov orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-4661-0421 ; University of Food Technologies (UFT), 26 Maritza boulevard, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Pascal Degraeve orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-5357-3433 ; Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), ISARA Lyon, BioDyMIA Research Unit, Technopole Alimentec, 155 rue Henri de Boissieu, 01000 Bourg en Bresse, France
Rafael Pagan orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-0238-6328 ; Departamento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2, Universidad de Zaragoza-CITA (UNIZAR), C. de Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 956 Kb

str. 357-377

preuzimanja: 162

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Tailor-made foods, also known as foods with programmable properties, are specialised systems with unique composition prepared by different methods, using the known mechanisms of action of their bioactive ingredients. The development of tailor-made foods involves the evaluation of individual components, including bioactive substances derived from waste products of other productions, such as essential oils. These components are evaluated both individually and in combination within food compositions to achieve specific functionalities. This review focuses on the application of minimal processing technologies for the production and preservation of tailor-made foods. It examines a range of approaches, including traditional and emerging technologies, as well as novel ingredients such as biomolecules from various sources and microorganisms. These approaches are combined according to the principles of hurdle technology to achieve effective synergistic effects that enhance food safety and extend the shelf life of tailor-made foods, while maintaining their functional properties.

§Paper was presented at the 11th Central European Congress on Food and Nutrition CEFood2022, Čatež ob Savi, Slovenia, 27-30 September 2022

Ključne riječi

tailor-made food; biopreservation; emerging technologies; minimal processing technologies

Hrčak ID:

309773

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/309773

Datum izdavanja:

14.11.2023.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 812 *




INTRODUCTION

Tailor-made foods – definition, development principles and technologies

By definition, a product can be called a tailor-made product if it is developed, adapted or suitable for a specific purpose or person. In the case of food development, it is most often assumed that tailor-made foods are foods developed for certain groups of consumers, which have been given certain functional characteristics (beyond their basic nutritional properties) and have been obtained/processed using appropriate technologies for maximum preservation of required functional/biological properties (1). To some extent, the term ‘tailor-made foods’ overlaps with the term ‘functional foods’. The term ‘functional foods’ was introduced in Japan for a special group of food products that were defined as follows: ‘food containing an ingredient with functions for health and officially approved to claim their physiological effects on the human body’. This terminology is also expressed in other documents in the USA and the European Union, but without the formalisation in the relevant documents (1,2). Currently, the term ‘functional’ is added to food products that have specific health benefits beyond the basic nutritional value of the product. Although there are currently legal definitions of a functional product (1,3-7), it is difficult to find a definition for the so-called tailor-made foods. In some cases, the concept of tailor-made foods is replaced by foods with programmable properties, although there is also no precise definition for the second concept. Therefore, it is possible to give the following definition: tailor-made foods (foods with programmable properties) are systems, the composition of which has been developed by various methods and means, by evaluating the activity of individual components (bioactive components, including the use of waste products from other productions, possessing a certain biological potential (e.g. essential oils), both individually and in the composition of foods, to achieve a certain functionality).

To obtain foods with programmable properties (tailor-made foods), it is necessary to follow four stages of development (8): (i) identification of the chemical, physical, nutritional, microbiological and functional properties and of the main ingredients in the target food and in the reference food product, (ii) development of databases of the main ingredients in the food and their influence on the functions of the food system, (iii) determination of appropriate combinations of basic components based on mathematical modelling and optimisation, and (iv) choosing a combination of components for the development of a nutritional system with a programmable property (functional foods).

Akterian (8) and Avramenko and Kraslawski (9) suggested that the development of a new product (tailor-made food) includes 4 stages (Fig. 1 (10)).

Fig. 1 Basic steps for the production of tailor-made foods, adapted from Salmerón (10)
FTB-61-357-f1

In methodological terms, tailor-made foods can be obtained by targeted fermentation, adding functional ingredients in various forms to the composition of the food matrix. Increasing the biological activity of certain components or its preservation in the food production process or the fermentation capacity of lactic acid bacteria and yeast without genetic changes can be achieved by encapsulation technologies. From a methodological point of view, the preparation of this type of active ingredients can be achieved by the following approaches: examining suitable carriers for inclusion of microorganisms, bioactive substances, fats (e.g. containing polyunsaturated fatty acids) and flavouring substances; study of the stability of the resulting encapsulated systems as well as the metabolic changes resulting from the encapsulation of microorganisms (10-16).

From the point of view of the technological operations used, they do not differ significantly from technological operations used in the production of standard food products. The maximum preservation of the intended functional properties is of great importance for the production of tailor-made foods. In this sense, their production is related to the application of concepts and developing technologies aimed at precisely this. Biopreservation using microorganisms and/or biomolecules (of plant, animal or microbial origin), the use of hurdle technologies to preserve the final food product, use of emerging non-thermal technologies (e.g. high hydrostatic pressure, irradiation and others) to preserve the biological properties of the final product can be enlisted as examples of this concept (17-20).

The focus of the present work is on the development of tailor-made foods through the application of a knowledge system in the field of biopreservation, hurdle technologies and minimal food processing (21,22).

The aim of this work is to consider minimal processing approaches for the production and preservation of tailor-made foods and to describe the synergistic effect of different processes.

HURDLE TECHNOLOGY PRINCIPLES AND THEIR POTENTIAL FOR PRESERVATION OF PERISHABLE/TAILOR-MADE FOOD

The concept of hurdle technology has been known for a long time, but it allows for integrated food preparation and preservation. Food with programmable composition, stable and safe properties can be developed by applying this technology. In recent years, this integrated approach has found increasing application due to consumer demands for minimal food processing (18). Therefore, in this publication we will consider the possibilities of combining obstacles in the preservation process, which are also important in the production of tailor-made foods.

Biological hurdles

Biopreservation with the help of natural or controlled microbiota, as well as different types of antimicrobial agents, is one of the techniques that, in addition to a preservative effect on foods, also has an impact on their functional properties (18). Biological hurdle can be one of two types – biological hurdle by microorganisms and biological hurdle by extracts from various raw materials or biomolecules. Microbial fermentation of foods by spontaneous fermentation or selected cultures makes it possible both to introduce a biological hurdle to the growth of undesirable microorganisms and to obtain a food product with beneficial properties for human health (18,22-24).

Improving the quality of food products can be related to the replacement of traditional preservation methods (including chemical substances used as preservatives) with natural alternatives (24). In a broader sense, biopreservation of food products is a method of preservation that uses the inhibitory activity of different types of biomolecules (of plant, animal, or microbial origin), the use of targeted fermentation with appropriate microorganisms, or a combination of these two approaches to inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms (18).

In this part of the article, we will discuss the different biological hurdles that can be used in the production of tailor-made foods.

Antimicrobial extracts and biomolecules

The use of natural compounds for their potential application as natural food biopreservatives is gaining significant interest due to negative consumer attitudes towards some synthetic antimicrobials currently used as food preservatives. These biopreservatives are natural ingredients or additives that can both retain a broad spectrum of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities and have the ability to improve the quality and shelf life of perishable food (25).

A perfect natural antimicrobial agent should meet the following requirements: (1) be effective in its natural form at low concentrations, (2) be non-toxic, (3) be economical, (4) not cause sensory changes in the product, and (5) inhibit a wide range of pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms. A number of compounds from natural sources have demonstrated the potential to be applied for food preservation due to their proven antimicrobial properties against a broad range of foodborne pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms (25).

The antimicrobial extracts/biomolecules can be of different origins, such as microbial origin (isolated from bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi), plant origin or animal origin, and can ensure food safety because of their antimicrobial activity against a wide spectrum of foodborne pathogens and spoilage microorganisms (26). Biopreservatives of plant or animal origin, natural or controlled microflora, such as lactic acid bacteria and the corresponding antibacterial metabolites produced by them (lactic acid, bacteriocins) have proven ability to inhibit colour loss, delay lipid oxidation, prolong storage life and, ultimately, ensure food safety. It is very important that the newly identified natural bioactive compounds not only have an antimicrobial effect specifically against foodborne pathogenic microorganisms and spoilage agents, but also do not negatively affect the consumer's own gastrointestinal microflora (26,27).

Some natural antimicrobials have been reported to inactivate microorganisms without negatively affecting the organoleptic or nutritional properties of food (28). Nevertheless, in complex food matrices, active biocompounds can bind due to electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions to other food components like proteins or lipids. Unfortunately, this restricts the availability of many natural antimicrobials. Moreover, the use of various processing methods can lead to a reduction in antimicrobial activity. Nanodelivery systems have thus been developed to improve the activity of some natural antimicrobial molecules (e.g. essential oil nanoemulsions). In a number of cases, incorporation of nanoparticles has been shown to be an effective and safe antimicrobial delivery system (26,27).

Some phenolic compounds of plant origin alter the microbial cell permeability, thus causing the loss of biomolecules from the inside of the cells (for example ribose and sodium glutamate). Some plant phenolics interact with membrane proteins and induce their structure and function alteration, thus interfering with cell membrane functionality. Impaired membrane functions are related to disruptions in electron transport, nutrient uptake, synthesis of proteins and nucleic acids and enzyme activity (27,29).

Lipids can inactivate microorganisms by the following three mechanisms: disruption of the bacterial cell membrane, hindering DNA replication or inhibition of other intracellular targets (27).

Antimicrobial peptides interact with the microbial cell membrane by adopting amphipathic structures. Membrane rupture in some locations causes the leaching out of essential cell biocomponents (27,30). For example, antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin results from the generation of pores in the cytoplasmic membrane of the target microorganism. This, in turn, leads to the loss of low-molecular-mass intracellular components and ions, and the disruption of the proton motive force (27,31).

Natural antimicrobials of plant origin. Phenolics (flavonoids and non-flavonoids), terpenes, aliphatic alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, organic acids, saponins, thiosulfinates and glucosinolates are the main compounds that impart plant antimicrobial properties (28,32). Plants, their corresponding essential oils, by-products and secondary metabolites can delay or inhibit the growth of bacteria, yeast and moulds (27,28,32). Plant extracts, including essential oils, have been observed to inhibit Gram-positive bacteria to a greater extent than Gram-negative bacteria (26). What makes a molecule even more effective for biopreservation of food is the presence of both antioxidant and antimicrobial components in the same molecule (29). The antimicrobial properties of products of plant origin are generally accompanied by an increased antioxidant capacity (27,33).

Natural antimicrobial agents of animal origin. Most animal-derived antimicrobial systems have evolved as part of the natural host defense mechanisms. The list of animal-derived antimicrobials includes antimicrobial proteins and peptides (like lactoferrin, pleurocidin, defensins and protamine) that are considered a viable alternative to antibiotic resistance (34). Moreover, some of these compounds could quickly destroy the cellular lipid bilayer membranes even of fast-growing microorganisms (28). Some of them also exhibit antifungal and antiviral activities in addition to their strong antibacterial effect against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (27,35).

Some enzymes have also demonstrated promising antimicrobial properties. For example, lactoperoxidase has been reported to have powerful antimicrobial activity against bacteria, fungi and viruses (36), and lysozyme is effective against food spoilage Gram-positive bacteria (28,37), Gram-positive bacteria being the main target for the lysozyme, while Gram-negative bacteria are resistant to lysozyme because of the lipopolysaccharide layer of their outer membrane that actually constitutes a physical barrier. It has been reported that the presence of surfactants and chelating agents such as EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) enhance the sensitivity of Gram-negative bacteria to lysozyme because these compounds can initiate membrane disruption (26,27).

Some animal-derived polysaccharides and lipids have also shown antimicrobial effects. Chitosan has polycationic structure and is applied as effective antifungal (38) and antibacterial agent (39). Food lipids can also inhibit the proliferation of microorganisms and thus prevent the growth of pathogens and spoilage microorganisms (27,40).

Natural preservatives of microbial origin

Natural preservatives produced by bacteria. Cationic bacteriocin interacts with anionic lipids in the membrane of Gram-positive bacteria and thus induces the formation of pores across cellular membranes (27). Nisin is produced by Lactoccocus lactis and acts against Gram-positive and spore-forming bacteria. Pediocins are synthesised by Pediococcus strains (P. acidilactici and P. pentosaceus) and have demonstrated significant efficiency against spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Enterococcus faecalis, Sttaphylococcus aureus and Clostridium perfringens (27,28). Reuterin (3-hydroxypropionaldehyde), produced and secreted by Lactobacillus reuteri, shows a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity against foodborne pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms. The antibacterial activity of lactic acid and other organic acids produced by starter culture bacteria, such as acetic and propionic acids, is due to their ability to cross cell membranes (at pH values below their pKa), resulting in reduced intracellular pH and disruption of the transmembrane proton motive force (27).

Natural preservatives produced by streptomycetes. Actinomycetes have the ability to synthesise a range of antifungal, antiviral, antitumour, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunosuppressive, plant-growth-promoting and herbicidal compounds (41). Streptomyces sp. synthesises a broad range of bioactive metabolites, for example, the antifungal natamycin is produced by fermentation using Streptomyces species. Natamycin has been shown to be effective against almost all yeasts and moulds in food but is inactive against bacteria and viruses (41). Its use as a food preservative is authorised in the EU.

Natural preservatives from algae and fungi. Many derivatives of marine algae are indeed promising new antimicrobial agents with multiple applications, including the pharmaceutical and food industries (27). Similarly to fruits, vegetables, herbs and spices, the antimicrobial activity of algae is combined with the antioxidant potential of their compounds (presence of α-tocopherol, carotenoids, polyphenols, phycobiliproteins and vitamin C) (27).

Bacteriophages. Another new and promising category of food biopreservatives are bacteriophages or their antibacterial enzymes (phage lysins or enzybiotics), which can be used directly as antibacterial agents due to their ability to act on and destroy the bacterial membranes. Bacteriophages have great potential as natural biopreservatives and can be used in various food systems due to their ability to selectively control the growth of bacterial populations. They are a promising alternative to antimicrobials, mainly because they have an almost unique host range that gives them great specificity. Moreover, their use does not have negative impact on the environment as in the case of antibiotics. The application of both phages and their enzymes could reduce the use of antibiotics, which is especially desirable having in mind the alarming increase in resistance to antibiotics used in human medicine, veterinary medicine, agriculture and all processes of manufacturing, preservation and distribution of food (42,43).

Bacterial quorum-sensing inhibitors and antagonists. It is well-known that quorum sensing plays a major role not only in food spoilage and food-related pathogenesis, but also in biofilm formation, virulence regulation, antimicrobial peptide synthesis, genetic competence and transfer of conjugative plasmids, sporulation and symbiosis (25). Bacterial quorum-sensing signalling systems can be a powerful weapon in controlling the growth of undesirable food-related bacteria. Quorum-sensing inhibitors/antagonists are being developed for use as new food preservatives to maintain food integrity, extend shelf life and enhance food safety because quorum-sensing signalling molecules are ubiquitous in many known bacterial species and have been linked to food spoilage. There are two types of quorum-sensing inhibitors: natural and synthetic quorum-sensing inhibitors. The natural quorum-sensing inhibitors have been obtained from prokaryotic, animal, plant, marine organisms and fungi. Nevertheless, the toxicological status of quorum-sensing inhibitors should be examined. It is a prerequisite to their use in food preservation (25).

Application of antimicrobials in successful biopreservation strategies. The antimicrobial activity of a particular compound depends largely on its physicochemical properties such as polarity, hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity, volatility and acid-dissociation property. It is quite challenging to generalise about methods for antimicrobial application because of the varying properties and antimicrobial action spectra among naturally occurring antimicrobials, the difference in food composition and microstructure (e.g. fat and protein content, pH, water activity and homogeneity), process factors and storage conditions (25).

The perfect antimicrobial agent should meet a number of requirements: (i) it must be effective against the microbial target, (ii) it must function in the chosen food system, (iii) it must have no or minimal interactions with food components, (iv) it must be stable during food processing and finally (v) it must not contribute to the development of resistance in target microorganisms or representatives of the microflora (25).

Bioprotective cultures

Lactic acid bacteria of the genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus and Lactococcus are of fundamental importance for the production of fermented foods. Bifidobacteria, some Escherichia coli strains, representatives of the Bacillus sp., moulds (primarily Aspergillus sp.) and yeasts (Saccharomyces sp.) can also be used as bioprotective cultures (25,44-48). Mainly because of their metabolism (and its products such as organic acids, mainly lactic and acetic acids, bacteriocins, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, reuterin and other metabolites), representatives of the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium have become established as bioprotective cultures for food production (17,25,48,49). Microorganisms of these genera have GRAS status because they are part of the natural microbiota of a number of foods (44).

An important element in the development of tailor-made foods is the possibility of combining several effects of a given food component. Many strains of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been classified as probiotics and fermented foods are an excellent source of such LAB (50).

The metabolites of lactic acid bacteria have a preservative effect via different mechanisms (17,51). The produced organic acids (lactic and acetic acids) reduce the pH of the medium and create a selective barrier that prevents the growth of certain microorganisms. Lactic acid has an antimicrobial effect by disrupting the cytoplasmic membrane (17,52). The CO2 produced by the heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria creates an anaerobic atmosphere that does not allow the growth of aerobic species. The diacetyl produced by lactic acid bacteria has antimicrobial effect against Listeria sp., Salmonella sp., Escherichia coli, Yersinia sp. and Aeromonas sp., H2O2 has an antimicrobial effect manifested by oxidative stress on the cell membrane (17).

Bacteriocins are of scientific and practical importance for biopreservation of food products. They are metabolites produced by lactic acid bacteria that are capable of inhibiting the growth of closely related microorganisms (17,51). These metabolites have GRAS status and do not affect the sensory characteristics of food. They are active against a wide range of food spoilage microorganisms and food pathogens (45,53). The antimicrobial activity of bacteriocins is mainly due to electrostatic interactions with negatively charged phosphates of phospholipids that create pores in the cell membrane, leading to cell lysis (17). Bacteriocins are of practical importance in the biopreservation of cheese, yoghurt, some types of meat products (54-56) and nisin, which is approved as food preservative in many countries (54), has perhaps gained the greatest practical importance. Some enterococci also produce bacteriocins (54). In their work, Settanni and Corsetti (57) showed that bacteriocins are used for biopreservation (introduced as protective or starter cultures) in fermented and non-fermented vegetables, meat, sourdough, juices, canned products, etc.

Yeasts are the second major group of bioprotective microorganisms. Due to their specificity and ability to grow under stressful conditions, they are used as bioprotective cultures in food production. Different yeasts are antagonistic to different spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms. Their antagonistic effect is to the result of competition in the assimilation of substrates and the production of a wide class of antimicrobial components (58). In addition, yeast antagonism is also a result of pH changes caused by the production of organic acids, tolerance to high ethanol concentrations and the production of the so-called killer toxins (58-63). In their work, Muccilli and Restuccia (58) showed the application of a number of yeast species (Candida pyralidae, Candida zeylanoides, Candida famata, Debaromyces hansenii, Debaromyces maramus, Hyphopichi. burtonii, Filobasidium floriforme, Kluyveromyces wickerhamii (Kwkt), Pichia membranifaciens, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and others) as bioprotective cultures in the production of beverages, dairy products, olives, bread and bakery products (58). In most cases, the bioprotective effect is due to a combination of the already described mechanisms.

Physical hurdles

Existing methods

Heat treatment is one of the most widely used physical methods for food preservation because it can effectively inactivate enzymes and microorganisms. Sterilisation, which requires high temperatures, is in fact currently one of the few technologies that can ensure the destruction of bacterial spores in food (64).

While the effectiveness of heat on inactivation of enzymes depends mainly on their thermostability, the inactivation of microorganisms can be more complex. Thus, the mechanisms of microbial inactivation by heat have been extensively studied and many different cellular alterations have been reported. It is generally assumed that heat disrupts multiple structures and functions of the microorganisms, with the sum of all changes leading to cell death. In general, when studying the effect of heat, the cellular structures or elements that have often been studied as susceptible are the outer and inner membrane, the peptidoglycan cell wall, nucleic acids (nucleoid and RNA), ribosomes and various enzymes (65).

Some of the limitations of conventional thermal treatments are uneven heating and low heat transfer efficiency in some foods, so more rigorous treatments must be applied to ensure that all parts of the whole food receive the minimum treatment required. In this regard, electromagnetic technologies have gained increased interest and demonstrated their potential for faster and more uniform heat treatments of food. Technologies such as infrared heating, microwave heating, radiofrequency heating and instant pressure drop control technology have shown to reduce these drawbacks and provide, at least in part, an alternative to conventional heat treatment in food preservation (66).

Despite advances in the use of thermal treatments, undesirable side effects of heat on the sensory, nutritional and functional properties of food could still occur (67). These changes in foods and the growing consumer demand for minimally processed foods have prompted the development of alternative, non-thermal preservation methods that offer safe foods with minimal processing treatments due to their antimicrobial efficacy (68). Technologies such as high hydrostatic pressure (HHP), pulsed electric field (PEF), ionising radiation (IR) and non-thermal atmospheric plasma (NTAP) have shown to be promising alternatives for food preservation.

Emerging technologies

High hydrostatic pressure. Industrial HHP processing is based on treatments with increased pressure (100–600 MPa) transmitted throughout the product using a pressure-transmitting medium with a duration of 1 to 20 min. These treatments at refrigeration or room temperature (4-25 °C) allow the extension of shelf-life and reduce microbial loads to levels comparable to those achieved by thermal pasteurisation, without affecting nutritional and sensory attributes (69). HHP treatments eliminate or inactivate vegetative forms of spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms, but not their spore form. However, HHP treatments have been shown to induce the germination of bacterial spores of several bacterial genera, such as Bacillus spp., and thus facilitate their inactivation by subsequent treatments (70).

The mechanisms of microbial inactivation by HHP are very complex and diverse. Microbial death is thought to be caused by the accumulation of all the damage to different cell structures and functions: disruption of the outer membrane, damage to the cytoplasmic membrane, alteration of pH homeostasis and osmoregulation, damage to cytoplasmic components (such as disintegration of ribosomes into their subunits, protein and enzyme unfolding) and damage to DNA and RNA by reactive oxidative stress (ROS) (71,72).

Nowadays, HHP is the most-widely used non-thermal technology for the commercial pasteurisation of food. According to Khouryieh (73), 35.6 % of food processing companies in the USA have implemented HHP technology in their production lines, followed by PEF technology at 20 %. HHP is mainly used for the preservation of fruit- and vegetable-derived products, egg products, dairy products, seafood, meat products and alcoholic beverages (74).

Pulsed electric field. PEF technology is a non-thermal method of food preservation that uses short pulses of electricity for microbial inactivation. Basically, PEF is based on the application of high-voltage pulses (20–80 kV/cm) for short periods of time (in the order of ms or μs) to a product enclosed by or flowing between two electrodes (75).

The mechanism of action of PEF on microorganisms is based on the disruption of the membranes by the induction of electromechanical compression that leads to the pore formation. This phenomenon is called electroporation and it can be reversible, i.e. the cell is only sublethally damaged and can recover, or irreversible, i.e. the damage cannot be repaired and the cell is inactivated (76,77). The inactivation of pathogenic and spoilage vegetative cells of bacteria and yeasts by PEF has been widely demonstrated. However, the few studies conducted on PEF inactivation of bacterial spores describe these structures as PEF-resistant and show that their inactivation is only achieved in combination with heat (78). For this reason, this technology is used as an alternative to pasteurisation rather than sterilisation. Therefore, PEF treatments can ensure food safety and extend the shelf life of certain foods, avoiding detrimental changes in food quality and maintaining physical, sensory and nutritional attributes compared to pasteurisation (79).

PEF is generally not suitable for preservation of solid food (79). Pasteurisation by PEF has been extensively demonstrated for various liquid food products such as fruit juices, milk and dairy products, soup, liquid egg and beverages, among others (80,81). However, this technology has several limitations in the food industry: food must be free from air bubbles and have low electrical conductivity. Moreover, PEF has proven to be useful in some processing steps such as for the extraction of compounds of interest, or in dehydration or freezing/thawing processes of solid food (82). Most consumers recognise and appreciate the benefits of PEF as an alternative pasteurisation method to heat, for example in apple juice. Nevertheless, there are still some consumers who have doubts about the safety of using PEF as a food preservation method (83), especially for traditional food such as wine.

Ionising radiation (IR). Food irradiation is a process in which food is exposed to a carefully measured amount of intense radiant energy called ionising radiation (IR), which is capable of ionising atoms or molecules by detaching electrons from them. This non-thermal technology is a preservation method with minimum effect on the quality, taste, appearance and texture of food. It assures the inactivation of pathogenic and spoilage bacteria, yeasts and moulds at the legal doses permitted in the European Union, except in their spore form (84,85).

The mechanism of bacterial inactivation in IR treatments is based on the damage to microbial DNA, either directly or indirectly (86). In the direct action, the IR directly hits the DNA molecules and disrupts the molecular structure. Such structural change leads to cell damage or even cell death. In the indirect action, the IR hits the water molecules, which are the major constituent of the microbial cell and other organic molecules inside the cell, and produces free radicals such as hydroxyl ion (OH˙) and hydrogen atoms (H˙). These free radicals have an unpaired electron in the structure that is very reactive and therefore reacts with DNA molecules and causes a molecular structural damage. In addition, these reactive species, also called reactive oxygen species (ROS), can damage other cellular structures, such as membranes, where alterations have been observed after IR treatment. Direct and indirect IR treatments lead to cell death of the microorganisms present in the food.

As per the General Standard for Irradiated Foods (87), food irradiation can be achieved using three different types of ionising radiation: (i) gamma rays emitted by radionuclides like cesium-137 (137Cs) or cobalt 60 (60Co), (ii) X-rays generated by machine sources operating at or below 5 MeV energy level and (iii) electron beams produced by electron accelerators at or below 10 MeV energy level (also known as e-beam).

For food irradiation, it is essential to ensure that the average absorbed radiation dose in processed food remains below 10 kGy and that none of this radiation has sufficient energy to produce radioactivity. Regarding the safety of IR, according to FAO, IAEA, WHO and the Scientific Committee on Food of the European Commission, foods irradiated with appropriate technologies and doses are safe and nutritionally adequate (88).

However, the use of this technology to treat food is very restricted in some countries by legal regulations. In the EU (88), the following foods may be treated (note that this depends on each member country): fruits and vegetables, including root vegetables; cereals, cereal flakes and rice flour; spices and condiments; fish and shellfish; fresh meat, poultry and frogs’ legs; raw milk camembert; gum arabic, casein/caseinates, egg white and blood products. It should be noted that in many cases the permitted irradiation is not aimed at microbial inactivation but at preventing or slowing down the germination of some vegetables, e.g. potatoes. All imported, exported, advertised, distributed, stored, manufactured and sold food items that have been irradiated, contain irradiated ingredients or have been processed from irradiated materials must bear the food irradiation logo on their labels (87).

IR offers several advantages over traditional heat-based or chemical food preservation methods including: treatment of packaged food, chemical and temperature independence, liquid and solid food and minimal organoleptic changes (89). However, IR still has some limitations for its application in some sectors of the agri-food industry, such as the legal restrictions on its use, the cost of facilities for its application, the high and costly safety measures for its safe and efficient use and the insufficient acceptance by consumers/manufacturers (73,84).

Non-thermal atmospheric plasma. NTAP is generated at room temperature and normal pressure by electrical discharge of a gas, resulting in ionisation, dissociation and excitation of its atoms and molecules. NTAP consists of numerous reactive units, such as electrons, positive and negative ions, free radicals, excited or unexcited atoms and molecules, and electromagnetic radiation (UV rays) (90). However, depending on the gas and the method used to generate NTAP, its constitution differs, including both ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). These include ozone (O3), superoxide (O2˙̄), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl (OH˙), peroxyl (ROO˙) radicals, singlet oxygen (1O2), atomic oxygen (O), nitric oxide (NO) or nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (91).

NATP has demonstrated strong antimicrobial properties against a broad group of food pathogens, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. (92). However, the mechanism of action of the NATP components that cause microbial inactivation is not yet fully understood. Many studies have observed the oxidative damage to various structural and functional cellular components by the reactive species produced in NATP. So far, the hypothesis supporting its good antimicrobial properties against bacteria is that these reactive species act on multiple cellular targets, and the sum of all damage would lead to cell death. Many authors have observed that the components of NATP (reactive species) can cause DNA damage, cell leakage, protein modification, lipid peroxidation and morphological changes, highlighting the membrane as one of the main structures altered by this technology (93).

This technology has several advantages that make it one of the most studied techniques in recent years for its use in the food industry: (i) low application cost, (ii) short treatment times, (iii) versatility in treating food and contact surfaces, (iv) treatment within the packaging to avoid subsequent contamination and (v) environmentally friendly technique as it can use ambient air (91). However, there are still some limitations to this technology that hinder its application for food preservation. In this sense, it is necessary to evaluate the nutritional and sensory effects depending on the intensity of the treatment and the food, the role of individual plasma components responsible for its antimicrobial properties, the lack of short- and long-term toxicity for consumers and the development of equipment that is easy to use (93).

ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE APPLICATION OF HURDLE TECHNOLOGY PRINCIPLES: COMBINATION OF ANTIMICROBIAL AND/OR ANTIOXIDANT PLANT EXTRACTS AND OTHER HURDLES

Despite advances and optimisations of non-thermal technologies, their use as the only method of food preservation sometimes requires very high treatment intensities that are not feasible in industry and/or lead to organoleptic changes in the food. For this reason, many studies are looking at combining different preservation methods (i.e. hurdles) to achieve synergistic effects. Successful synergism occurs when two or more hurdles are applied simultaneously and/or sequentially and the obtained bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect is greater than that achieved by the hurdles applied individually. Thus, these preservation methods would achieve the degree of inactivation necessary to ensure food safety at lower treatment intensity, with lower impact on the organoleptic and nutritional value of food.

As mentioned above, for example, the doses of essential oils and their individual constituents required for food preservation are not very high (in the order of hundreds of ppm), but even these small concentrations can lead to changes in odour and taste of the food that consumers might reject (94). Therefore, the development of new strategies to optimise the efficacy of essential oils and individual constituents in food preservation is focused on reducing the concentrations and thus consumer acceptance.

Among the possible methods of food preservation, one of the most promising is the combination of these technologies, whether traditional such as heat or emerging such as HHP, PEF, IR, or NATP treatments, in combination with the addition of antimicrobial compounds of natural origin. The combined use of antimicrobials has shown that their individual constituents interact effectively, and great synergistic effects have been described that can either inhibit or inactivate pathogenic or food spoilage microorganisms (95).

Essential oils and existing methods (mild heat)

Numerous studies support the synergistic effect of some essential oils or their individual constituents combined with mild temperatures on the inactivation of pathogenic or food spoilage microorganisms. In fact, among the physical hurdles, heat is the most studied method in combination with essential oils and individual constituents, which show synergistic effects when applied simultaneously (95).

Ait-Ouazzou et al. (96) observed synergistic effects when combining heat (54–60 °C) with 0.2 μL/L Mentha pulegium L. or Thymus algeriensis L. essential oil, which reduced by 3.5 and 5.7 times, respectively, the time of inactivation of 5 log cycles of E. coli O157:H7 cells in apple juice. Pagan et al. (97) observed a remarkable synergism between heat and citral against E. coli O157:H7 at acid and neutral pH; while heat treatment at 53 °C for 15 min reduced only less than 1 log cycles of bacteria, more than 4 log cycles were inactivated with 0.1 μL/L citral. It should be noted that 0.1 μL/L citral applied without heat did not inactivate E. coli O157:H7 Sakai. Similar synergistic effects have been reported between essential oils and heat against non-pathogenic Escherichia coli (98), Listeria monocytogenes (99) or Cronobacter sakazakii (100). A recent study has demonstrated that the combination of heat and essential oils can inactivate even heat-resistant microbial variants in coconut water; the addition of 200 μL/L carvacrol increased the thermal reduction of heat-resistant variants of E. coli O157:H7 in coconut water at 57 °C from less than 2 log units to more than 5 log units (101).

In addition, the synergism between heat and essential oils or individual constituents has been demonstrated in sessile cells, which are usually highly resistant to common disinfectants due to the protection by the biofilm-forming polysaccharides (102). This study showed the inactivation of more than 5 log cycles of sessile cells that are part of mature biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus SC-01, Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e or Escherichia coli MG1655, after treatments with either carvacrol or citral (1000 μL/L) at moderate temperatures (45 °C). Some studies have shown large synergistic effects that allow the temperatures and the concentrations of essential oils or individual constituents to be reduced to intensities and dosages that are sensorially acceptable to consumers in fruit juices and vegetables soup (94,103).

In order to improve the chemical stability of essential oils and reduce the required doses, several studies have investigated the use of these antimicrobials in emulsified or encapsulated form in combination with heat. While the use of citral emulsified with Tween® 80 reduced the synergistic effect with heat compared to the use of citral in its free form (97), orange essential oil in its emulsified form with chitosan showed an increased bactericidal effect in apple juice (104). As for encapsulation, Merino et al. (105) reported that encapsulation with zein reduced the bactericidal effect of thyme essential oil. However, when these encapsulations were used in combination with heat at 53 °C, synergistic effects against E. coli and L. monocytogenes were observed to an even greater extent than with the essential oil in free form.

Cell membrane disruption and loss of cell membrane potential are considered to be the main causes of bacterial inactivation by heat and individual constituents (106). However, it is very likely that the basis of the strong synergy between heat and essential oils or individual constituents is caused by multiple damages and/or alterations of other cellular structures or functions targeted by both preservation methods.

Essential oils and emerging methods

Emerging technologies for food preservation are proposed as an alternative to heat treatments because they have minimal or little impact on food quality. However, these technologies alone are not always able to ensure food safety and extended shelf-life. For this reason, many authors are pursuing the development of strategies based on the combination of these physical methods with natural antimicrobials, such as essential oils or their individual constituents (107).

HHP was combined with essential oil, which led to interesting results. According to Espina et al. (108), the combination of HHP treatments (175–400 MPa for 20 min) with 200 μL/L of each essential oil (Citrus sinensis L., Citrus reticulata L., Thymus algeriensis L. and Rosmarinus officinalis L.) or their individual constituents ((+)-limonene and carvacrol) were able to inactivate about 4–5 log cycles of the initial cell populations of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes in orange and apple juices. Another study showed that the addition of nanoemulsified Mentha piperita essential oil improved the lethality of HHP treatments against E. coli O157:H7 in tropical fruit juices (109). Synergistic effects were also observed with HHP treatments (200 MPa) in combination with cauliflower or mandarin infusion against S. typhimurium (110).

It is likely that the observed synergism between HHP and essential oils is based on the damage caused to one of the main targets of both preservation methods: the cell envelopes. The accumulation of damage in this structure could be the reason for the increased antimicrobial efficacy when both technologies are used in combination (109). Other studies indicated that HHP can also alter membrane structure, leading to a reduction in the microbial resistance to natural antimicrobials (111).

However, not all combinations of HHP and natural antimicrobials always show synergism. For example, according to Bleoanca et al. (112), a combined treatment at 200–300 MPa with thyme extract did not improve the antimicrobial effect. Thus, a synergistic, additive or antagonistic effect can be observed when HHP is combined with antimicrobial compounds, depending on the antimicrobial compound, its mode of action and dosage (113).

Regarding PEF treatments, several studies reported a synergistic effect when this non-thermal technology is combined with essential oils or their individual constituents. According to Wang et al. (114), a synergistic effect was observed between PEF and carvacrol against S. aureus when individual constituents were added to the recovery agar medium. Enhanced antimicrobial activity of PEF in combination with citral (0.2 µL/mL) was described against E. coli (30 kV/cm) and with mandarin and cauliflower infusion (5 %) against S. Typhimurium (20 kV/cm) (115). It is likely that the electroporation triggered by PEF treatment enhances the effect of essential oils or individual constituents on the cell membrane and even allows the entry of the natural antimicrobials into the cytoplasm, increasing its antimicrobial activity (116).

However, some studies have reported that the combination of PEF with essential oils or individual constituents does not always have a synergistic lethal effect. For example, Somolinos et al. (117) observed that the lethal effect of PEF treatment to inactivate E. coli was the same in the presence or absence of citral (200 μL/L). In this context, some studies suggest that the synergistic effect of PEF and essential oils or individual constituents depends on the way the antimicrobial agents are used (e.g. emulsified) and the design of the combined treatment (simultaneous or sequential treatment). Several studies suggest that the addition of essential oils and individual constituents in emulsified form may increase the synergistic effect of combined treatment with PEF (109,117). Furthermore, Clemente et al. (118) found that the simultaneous application of PEF and an essential oil did not have any synergistic effect on microbial inactivation, whereas this was the case when the essential oil was added after PEF treatment.

Nevertheless, the magnitude of the synergistic effect when combining essential oils or individual constituents with PEF is usually smaller than with heat (109). Under the same experimental conditions, citral in combination with heat produced a synergistic effect more than three times greater than that observed with PEF against E. coli O157:H7 (97).

As for the IR treatments with essential oil and individual constituents, synergistic effects were observed with the combined use of both hurdles for microbial control of foodborne pathogenic bacteria (Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and Vibrio spp.) contaminating flour, fish, maize and rice (107).

The combination of cinnamon essential oil (3 %) encapsulated in alginate with gamma IR (1.5 kGy) has shown synergistic effects in inhibiting a cocktail of resistant Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains in dry fermented sausages during ripening and shelf life after vacuum packaging (119). Begum et al. (120) also reported an increase in the antimicrobial effect of gamma and X-ray irradiation (up to 1500 Gy) against Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in rice when combined with oregano/thyme essential oil. Moreover, the combination of IR with essential oil has also been studied against moulds with promising results. Shankar et al. (121) observed the potential of a mixture of oregano and thyme essential oil to increase the radiosensitisation not only of bacteria, Bacillus cereus and Paenibacillus amylolyticus, but also of moulds, Aspergillus niger, during treatment with gamma rays or X-ray irradiation.

In recent years, the antimicrobial properties of essential oils in edible food coatings have been further explored, as well as their combination with other preservation technologies such as IR. According to Abdeldaiem et al. (122), the combined effect of gamma IR (1 kGy) and coatings containing mass fraction of 0.5 % rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) essential oil reduced the number of Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Vibrio spp. and Salmonella spp. Hossain et al. (123) also observed a synergistic effect against moulds when combining both preservation methods; chitosan-based nanocomposite films loaded with thyme and oregano essential oils showed significantly higher antifugal activity against Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus and Penicillium chrysogenum in rice at a dose of 750 Gy compared to treatment with the bioactive film or IR alone.

On one hand, according to Ayari et al. (124), IR enhances the microbial inactivation of the essential oil by altering the integrity of the cell membrane and facilitating the entry of antimicrobial compounds, thereby increasing cell damage. On the other hand, the mechanisms of IR and essential oil or individual constituents include an increase in the generation of intracellular ROS in bacterial cells and consequently increased cell damage (120). In this sense, it is likely that the generation of intracellular ROS by both preservation methods leads to a synergistic effect that enhances antimicrobial activity in combined processes.

As for NATP with essential oil, there are not many publications that have investigated their combination against foodborne pathogenic bacteria in food. Nevertheless, some authors have observed an important synergistic effect of NATP in combination with natural antimicrobials. According to Matan et al. (125), the antibacterial activity of clove oil, sweet basil oil and lime oil was enhanced by NATP (20–40 W for 10 min) to effectively control the growth of Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus on chicken egg. The best results were observed with clove oil and NATP at 40 W, which completely inhibited all bacteria tested in the study. Moreover, the combination of essential oil and NATP was also tested to control biofilm formation of foodborne pathogenic bacteria such as E. coli and S. aureus (125). Getnet et al. (126) demonstrated that the deposition of carvacrol thin film on stainless steel by NATP completely inhibited E. coli biofilm formation and reduced S. aureus adhesion by six orders of magnitude, which was a slight improvement over the use of carvacrol alone. However, it should be noted that this synergistic effect was not due to an interaction of the mechanisms of action of NATP and essential oil on the bacteria, but to an enhancement of the deposition of carvacrol, thus preventing biofilm adhesion and growth (126).

Plant extracts and modified atmosphere or vacuum packaging

In vacuum packaging the air is removed from the package before it is sealed. This procedure reduces the atmospheric oxygen in the packaged foods, thereby limiting the growth of aerobic microorganisms and oxidation of foods. However, soft or spongy foods such as salads or soft-crust bread are too delicate to withstand vacuum packaging. Another drawback of vacuum packaging of foods such as raw beef results from the purple colour of deoxymyoglobin, while consumers associate the bright red colour of raw beef (due to oxymyoglobin) with its freshness.

Unlike vacuum packaging, modified atmosphere packaging offers the possibility to choose the initial gas composition of the inner atmosphere of packaged foods. For example, high-oxygen modified atmosphere packaging (HOMAP) allows the preservation of the red colour of raw beef for a longer time. The addition of carbon dioxide at volume fractions higher than 20 % in modified atmosphere is another way to extend the shelf life of refrigerated foods susceptible to microbial deterioration by taking advantage of their bacteriostatic and fungistatic properties above this volume fraction. However, too high carbon dioxide volume fractions can lead to mild acidification of foods resulting from partial carbon dioxide solubilisation in food matrices (127). Nitrogen is an inert gas with limited solubility in water and fat, and it is usually used to replace oxygen or in addition to carbon dioxide to prevent package collapse due to carbon dioxide partial solubilisation in foods.

The possibility to further extend the shelf life of perishable foods packaged under vacuum or modified atmosphere by adding natural antimicrobial molecules, including plant extracts, has already been pointed out by Mastromatteo et al. (128) in their review. However, most studies investigating the potential of modified atmosphere packaging in combination with plant extracts have been published in the last decade (Table 1 (129-143)). The potential of such combinations has been tested mainly for the preservation of high value-added foods prone to rapid spoilage such as fish, seafood, poultry and meat. Increasing interest in the use of the antimicrobial and/or antioxidant activity of plant extracts has been stimulated by concerns about the toxicity of food preservatives and antioxidants, such as nitrites or sulfites. The plant extracts used can be an essential oil (usually produced by steam distillation and containing only volatile constituents) or extracts prepared with solvents of different polarity (water, ethanol, supercritical CO2, etc). Most plant extracts contain phenolics that give them antioxidant activity, which is particularly interesting for prolonging the shelf life of red meat stored in HOMAP (129-137) or fish and seafood stored in MAP containing oxygen (140). Moreover, many essential oils (144) and phenolic-rich edible plant extracts (145) exert antimicrobial activity against undesirable microorganisms that can extend the shelf life of perishable foods. While plant extracts almost always exhibit antioxidant activity resulting from their phenolic constituents, not all plant extracts that have antimicrobial activity in vitro in microbiological media exert this antimicrobial activity in food (130,132). This is likely due to the interactions of the antimicrobial constituents of plant extracts with some food components (complexation of phenolics by some food proteins, interaction of hydrophobic essential oil with dispersed fat). These interactions would limit the quantity of these molecules accumulating on the surface of the target microorganisms, thereby inhibiting their growth or leading to cell lysis by different mechanisms of action (146-148). The sometimes reported lack of the effect of plant extracts on total viable count during storage of modified atmosphere packaged foods could also be due to the fact that total viable count refers to different microorganisms in the complex microbial ecosystem of such foods. Therefore, plant extracts should have a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity to significantly reduce the total viable counts during refrigerated storage of such foods. An analysis of the literature shows that while plant phenolics are generally effective antioxidants in food matrices, plant phenolics that inhibit the growth of certain microorganisms in vitro in microbiological media are not always effective in food matrices, which have a far more complex composition and microstructure. Nevertheless, since not only microbial spoilage of perishable foods but also their oxidation alters their organoleptic quality and limits their shelf life, the addition of plant extracts generally results in a further extension of the shelf life of foods packaged under modified atmosphere. However, a frequently reported limit to their use is their effect on sensory properties (137,138). Their taste or odour can be excessive at concentrations that effectively inhibit unwanted microorganisms in foods. In this context, the use of mixtures of antimicrobial plant extracts selected for their synergistic antimicrobial activity has been proposed to reduce the amount of individual plant extracts. In line with hurdle technology principles, several authors have considered additional hurdles besides the combination of refrigeration, modified atmosphere packaging and the addition of antimicrobial and antioxidant plant extracts. Olatunde et al. (140) took advantage of an antioxidant plant extract to limit the defects caused by oxidation of fish during the 5-minute cold plasma treatment. Frangos et al. (142) combined the addition of oregano essential oil with the reduction of water activity by salting trout fillets. Mahdavi and Ariaii (143) combined grape pomace extracts with nisin to extend the shelf life of fish sausage. Interestingly, Kurek et al. (149,150) used the volatility of the antimicrobial essential oil constituents to control their release in the vapour phase, which opens the prospect of placing an essential oil reservoir in modified atmosphere packaging system. This reservoir can be an induction layer with essential oils on the inside of food packaging films.

Table 1 Examples of the effects of the addition of plant extracts/phenols on the shelf life/properties of modified atmosphere (MAP) or vacuum packaged foods
Food typeModified atmosphere composition
φ/%
Plant extract/ phenolEffect on food shelf life/propertiesReference
Ground beefO2 80, CO2 20
high oxygen MAP
Tannic acidTreatment with w(tannic acid)=200 mg/kg resulted in a lower number of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and psychrophilic bacterial count and had the highest likeliness score for colour after 15 days of storage at 4 °C (129)
Ground beef pattyO2 70, CO2 20, and N2 high oxygen MAP 10Prune flesh, pomegranate peel, green tea leaves, grape seed extracts, and Gaillac red wine powderAddition of w(plant extract)=1 % did not affect microbial counts (total viable counts, psychrotrophic aerobic bacteria) during 12 days of storage at 4 °C
No increase in thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances was observed for 12 days in patties with w(green tea)=1 %, pomegranate peel or grape seed extract and Gaillac red wine powder
(130)
Bovine meat pattyO2 80, CO2 high oxygen MAP 20Sugarcane bagasse, orange peel and tomato pomaceSugarcane bagasse, orange peel and tomato pomace reduced oxidative deterioration of colour, lipids and proteins and delayed the growth of microorganisms for 12 days at 4 °C (131)
Ground bovine meat (w(patty)=85 % and w(pork fat)=15 %)O2 80, CO2 high oxygen MAP 20Grape seed extractThe addition of w(grape seed extract)=0.75 g/kg improved the colour stability, inhibited the lipid and myoglobin oxidation of raw patties but did not affect total viable counts for 10 days of storage at 4 °C (132)
Pork loinO2 80, CO2 high oxygen MAP 20w(gallic acid)=0.2 % with w(nisin)=0.2 % in a chitosan coatingLowest thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances values and total viable count after 20 days of cold storage when gallic acid and nisin were incorporated together into chitosan films (133)
Raw pork pattyO2 80 and CO2 high oxygen MAP 20Oak wood extractAddition of up to w(extract)=1 % inhibited the growth of enterobacteria, lipid oxidation (including a decrease of the volatile compounds resulting from their oxidation reactions) during 12 days of storage at 4 °C
Modifications of organoleptic properties after the addition of oak wood were well accepted
(134)
Pork burgerO2 80, CO2 high oxygen MAP 20Pitanga leaf extractUntargeted metabolomics approach was used to study the effect of adding w(pitanga leaf extract)=250 mg/kg to pork burgers during 18 days of storage at 2 °C; its lipid antioxidant effect was confirmed (135)
Lamb cutletO2 50, CO2 30 and N2 high oxygen MAP 20North-African
essential oils from Pituranthos chloranthus and Teucrium ramosissimum
Spraying the surface of lamb cutlets with 1 % essential oil solutions in V(ethanol):V(water)=70:30 resulted in a decrease of total viable counts, Enterobacteriaceae, lactic acid bacteria and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances during 12 days of storage at 4 °C (136)
Poultry filletN2 70,
CO2 MAP 30
Oregano essential oil and grapefruit seed extract0.5 % oregano essential oil with 0.1 % grapefruit seed extract effectively inhibited Listeria monocytogenes and to a lesser extent Salmonella Typhimurium, but negatively affected sensory properties (137)
Broiler chicken
cut
CO2 65, N2 MAP 35Ethanol extracts of Finnish sea buckthorn berries or lingonberries, supercritical CO2ˉ extracts from a commercial blend or oregano leavesFresh brined skinless broiler chicken breast cuts in marinade had a final w=0.2 % of each extract. Commercial blend and oregano extracts inhibited the growth of lactic acid bacteria unlike sea buckthorn and lingonberry extracts. Nevertheless, the dose of the commercial blend and oregano leaf extract should be adjusted because of their strong taste (138)
Cooked sausage made from pork meat, emmer wheat,
almond and hazelnut
Vacuum-packedCommercial mix of pomegranate
and Citrus spp. extracts
Addition of w(mix)=1 % resulted in: (i) a significant decrease in total viable and psychrophilic microbial counts and lactobacilli during 60 days of cold storage and (ii) a 16-day extension of shelf life estimated from sensory analysis (139)
Asian sea bass sliceCO2 60, Ar2 30, O2 MAP 10Ethanol coconut husk extract encapsulated in liposomesA synergistic effect of the addition of 400 ppm ethanol coconut husk extract encapsulated in liposomes with a cold plasma treatment for 5 min before packaging resulted in the extension of shelf-life for more than 18 days at 4 °C (140)
Mediterranean octopus (Octopus vulgaris)Vacuum packagingOregano essential oilTreatment with w(oregano essential oil)=0.2 and 0.4 % resulted in: (i) a significant reduction of total aerobic plate count, Pseudomonas spp., H2S-producing bacteria, lactic acid bacteria and Enterobacteriaceae and (ii) extension of shelf life for 8 and 17 days (141)
Trout filletVacuum packagingOregano essential oil with saltShelf life was extended from 14 to 16-17 days after the addition of w(oregano essential oil)=0.2 % (142)
Fish sausage produced from silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)CO2 70, N2 MAP 30Grape pomace extract with nisinDecrease in total viable count, psychotropic bacterial count and Clostridium botulinum during 42 days of storage at 4 °C (143)

Essential oils and biopreservation

The antimicrobial activity of essential oils occurs in several ways depending on the wide variety of components that they contain. The main target in all microbial cells is the cytoplasmic membrane (151), from which permeability is influenced by its composition and the hydrophobicity of the compounds that pass through it. Thus, due to the hydrophobic nature of essential oils, the activity of these compounds triggers structural and functional damage to the cytoplasmic membrane of bacterial cells and changes its structure and fluidity (151). The consequences are dissipation of proton motive force with regard to the reduction of the ATP pool, internal pH disorder, electrical potential perturbation and loss of metabolites and ions, such as potassium and phosphate, ultimately culminating in cell death (151).

The antibacterial mechanisms of essential oils depend not only on their respective structures, chemical constituents and functional groups but also on their synergistic interactions with other preservative molecules or bioprotective cultures. Moreover, the mode of action of essential oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria differs, which is related to the structure and composition of the outer membrane of cell walls (152).

The effect of essential oils in food as biopreservatives depends on various associated factors, such as the form of application, the concentration applied, the pathway of action, the storage conditions and the methods of application, such as spraying, immersion and embedding in lactose capsules (42).

Food biopreservation is a method of food preservation that uses various natural ingredients and metabolites with antimicrobial activity. Moreover, through the application of antimicrobial substances produced by beneficial microorganisms released during a targeted fermentation, biopreservation is a method that both has a preservative effect on the food and can provide the food product with functional and health-promoting properties. This dual beneficial effect can be achieved by incorporating ingredients with proven preservative and functional effects into the food product, which can act as separate hurdles for achieving biopreservation and agents that make the developed food product a functional food. A good example of this is the development of successful biopreservation strategies for different food products by the application of essential oils from various plant species and probiotic bacteria. Our team has studied the synergistic effect of selected probiotic lactic acid bacteria and essential oils with high antimicrobial activity against pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms for the biopreservation of chocolate mousse emulsion and egg-free mayonnaise emulsion (153-155).

Three methods of biological preservation of mayonnaise or chocolate mousse were used: (i) with probiotic bacteria only, by incorporation of free and encapsulated cells into the food emulsion, (ii) with essential oil only and (iii) with a combination of probiotic bacteria and essential oil. The obtained chocolate mousse variants had preserved organoleptic properties and microbiological safety. Free or encapsulated probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum D2 cells applied alone or in combination with lemon or grapefruit essential oil provided biopreservation of the chocolate mousse emulsions, maintaining a high concentration of viable cells (106–107 CFU/g) during 20-days storage under refrigerated conditions (153). The mayonnaise variants preserved with L. plantarum LBRZ12 maintained a high concentration of viable cells of the probiotic strain during storage (154). In the development of the chocolate mousse variants, the combined application of free or encapsulated probiotic LAB and lemon or grapefruit essential oil resulted in better biopreservation than the use of probiotic LAB or essential oil alone, thus suggesting a synergistic effect between the two biopreservative agents. Moreover, the obtained chocolate mousse emulsions could be classified as functional foods and the chocolate mousse food matrix can be successfully used as a vehicle for delivery of probiotic LAB to a wide range of food consumers (153). A similar trend was observed in the development of the mayonnaise variants, thus confirming the synergistic effect of probiotic bacteria and essential oils as two hurdles used for the development of a successful biopreservation strategy for the two food emulsion types (154).

Since the antimicrobial activity of a given agent determined in vitro is usually higher than the antimicrobial activity of the same agent determined in situ, it was of great importance to examine the changes in the dynamics of a mixed population of a pathogen and a probiotic strain by a microbial challenge test. Two parallel experiments were conducted: in vitro examination of the changes in the population dynamics in complex nutrient medium (MRS broth) and in situ tests of the changes in the population dynamics in chocolate mousse food matrix at two temperatures (4±2) and (20±2) °C. The conducted study demonstrated that the use of free or encapsulated probiotic Lactobacillus helveticus 2/20 cells for biopreservation of chocolate mousse is a promising hurdle to reduce pathogen survival (of E. coli ATCC 25922 and S. aureus ATCC 25923). In addition, the results of the in situ and in vitro studies showed that the inhibition in MRS broth was similar to that in the chocolate mousse stored at (20±2) °C. Nevertheless, the effect of pathogen inhibition at (4±2) °C was different between the in vitro and in situ studies. As expected, the effect of pathogen inhibition was weaker in the food matrix than in the nutrient medium. This confirms the fact that an in situ evaluation is imperative before confirming the biopreservation potential of any bioprotector (155).

COOPERATION AND PERSPECTIVES

To study the minimal processes for the production of tailor-made foods, a project was developed and financed within the framework of the national programme European Scientific Networks, funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Bulgaria. The project proposed a concept called TaiMFoods (Fig. 2) to investigate different aspects of the production and preservation of tailor-made foods. This concept is based on the scientific expertise of individual project partners and enables the building of a multidisciplinary team for the development of new types of food through the application of established and new technologies. The development and implementation of the TaiMFoods project is related to the defined strategic directions for scientific research in the Republic of Bulgaria 2017–2030. An important element of the strategy is the development of new technologies in the field of food technology and biotechnology with the aim of improving the quality of life through the introduction of sustainable and healthy food production processes. The strategy promotes the formation of consortia of scientific, educational and development institutions to conduct high-quality scientific research in strategic areas. The implementation of the TaiMFoods project is precisely such a strategic partnership.

Fig. 2 Basic tasks of TaiMFoods project
FTB-61-357-f2

The building of the consortium aims to develop a constantly evolving and sustainable research platform in the field of food production with programmable properties. Taking into account the different directions of work, the scientific objectives of the consortium focus on carrying out research in the following directions: (i) mechanism of biological activity of biomolecules and microorganisms in the development of foods with programmable properties (including bioactive substances derived from waste products of the food industry), (ii) processing methods to increase food safety and shelf life of tailor-made foods by applying biopreservation, hurdle technologies and minimal food processing and (iii) methods for analysis of the distribution and activity of biomolecules and microorganisms in food matrices.

CONCLUSIONS

Food systems with programmable properties (tailor-made foods) are systems that have not only nutritional but also certain functional properties related to human health. Their production requires an integrated approach to the evaluation of nutritional and functional properties, the creation of databases of the various ingredients and their influence on food functionality. Therefore, it is important to form teams of different specialists working on targeted projects for the successful development of tailor-made foods. The development of tailor-made foods that are minimally processed to preserve both the organoleptic quality and the bioactive constituents of the food, as well as to incorporate the ingredients, such as probiotic microorganisms or some plant extracts that have a positive effect on both the shelf life of the food and its content of health-promoting components is promising. The rational development of such tailor-made foods requires the identification of the mechanisms of action of antimicrobial molecules and/or classical and emerging food preservation methods. The principles of hurdle technology for the preservation of perishable foods make it necessary to combine preservation methods and/or antimicrobial agents with different molecular mechanisms of action. Indeed, it is suggested that hurdles with different mechanisms of action are more likely to act synergistically. The combination of biological hurdles such as probiotic cultures and essential oils is of particular importance for the development of specialised tailor-made foods and products. Appropriate combinations of these two hurdles not only provide a biopreservative effect, but create products with potential health benefits for the human body.

Notes

[1] Financial disclosure FUNDING

This work was supported by the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science under the National Research Programme ’Healthy Foods for a Strong Bio-Economy and Quality of Life’ approved by DCM No 577/17.08.2018 and by the project ’Strengthening the research excellence and innovation capacity of University of Food Technologies - Plovdiv, through the sustainable development of tailor-made food systems with programmable properties’, part of the European Scientific Networks National Programme funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Bulgaria (agreement No Д01–288/07.10.2020).

[2] Conflicts of interest CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

1 

Alongi M, Anese M. Re-thinking functional food development through a holistic approach. J Funct Foods. 2021;81:104466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2021.104466

2 

Martirosyan DM, Singh J. A new definition of functional food by FFC: What makes a new definition of functional food unique? Funct Food Health Dis. 2015;5:209–23. https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v5i6.183

3 

Clydesdale F. Functional foods: Opportunities and challenges. Food Technol. 2004;58(12): Available fromhttps://www.ift.org/news-and-publications/food-technology-magazine/issues/2004/december/features/functional-foods-opportunities-and-challenges

4 

Gur J, Mawuntu M, Martirosyan DM. FFC’s advancement of functional food definition. Funct Food Health Dis. 2018;8:385–97. https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v8i7.531

5 

Santini A, Cammarata SM, Capone G, Ianaro A, Tenore GC, Pani L, et al. Nutraceuticals: Opening the debate for a regulatory framework. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(4):659–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13496 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433155

6 

Day L, Seymour RB, Pitts KF, Konczak I, Lundin L. Incorporation of functional ingredients into foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2009;20:388–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.05.002

7 

DeFelice S. The nutraceutical revolution: Its impact on food industry R&D. Trends Food Sci Technol. 1995;6(2):59–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(00)88944-X

8 

Akterian S. Food product design. Food Proc Ind Mag. 2016;65:9–15. [in Bulgarian]

9 

Avramenko Y, Kraslawski A, editors. Case based design: Applications in process engineering. In: Kacprzyk, editor. Studies in computational intelligence, vol. 87. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75707-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75707-8

10 

Salmerón I. Fermented cereal beverages: From probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic towards nanoscience designed healthy drinks. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017;65(2):114–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12740 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28378421

11 

Leroy F, De Vuyst L. Fermented food in the context of a healthy diet: How to produce novel functional foods? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014;17(6):574–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000000108 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115795

12 

Shiby VK, Mishra HN. Fermented milks and milk products as functional foods - A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53(5):482–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.547398 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391015

13 

Malik T. Perspective uses of essential oils in functional foods and antimicrobial packaging material. In: Information Resources Management Association, editor. Food science and nutrition: Breakthroughs in research practice. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global; 2018. pp. 235-65. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5207-9.ch012 https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5207-9.ch012

14 

Delshadi R, Bahrami A, Tafti AG, Barba FJ, Williams LL. Micro and nano-encapsulation of vegetable and essential oils to develop functional food products with improved nutritional profiles. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020;104:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.07.004

15 

Suárez M, Gual-Grau A, Ávila-Román J, Torres-Fuentes C, Mulero M, Aragonès G, et al. Oils and oilseeds in the nutraceutical and functional food industries. In: Lafarga T, Bobo G, Aguiló-Aguayo I, editors. Oil and oilseed processing: Opportunities and challenges. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2021. pp. 219-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119575313.ch11 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119575313.ch11

16 

Tripathy S, Verma DK, Thakur M, Patel AR, Srivastav PP, Singh S. at al. Encapsulated food products as a strategy to strengthen immunity against COVID-19. Front Nutr. 2021;8:673174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.673174 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095193

17 

Singh VP. Recent approaches in food bio-preservation - A review. Open Vet J. 2018;8(1):104–11. https://doi.org/10.4314/ovj.v8i1.16 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721439

18 

Putnik P, Pavlić B, Šojić B, Zavadlav S, Žuntar I, Kao L, et al. Innovative hurdle technologies for the preservation of functional fruit juices. Foods. 2020;9(6):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9060699 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32492780

19 

Pal J, Ravi OPK, Kumari S, Singh AK. Preservation of seafoods by hurdle technology. In: Lal Ranabhat CL, editor. Meat and nutrition. London, UK: IntechOpen; 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95900 https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95900

20 

Slavov AM, Denev PN, Denkova ZR, Kostov GA, Denkova-Kostova RS, Chochkov RM, et al. Emerging cold pasteurization technologies to improve shelf life and ensure food quality. In: Galanakis CM, editor. Food quality and shelf life. London, UK: Academic Press; 2019. pp. 55-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817190-5.00003-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817190-5.00003-3

21 

Leyva Salas M, Mounier J, Valence F, Coton M, Thierry A, Coton E. Antifungal microbial agents for food biopreservation - A review. Microorganisms. 2017;5(3):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5030037 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28698479

22 

Ganguly S. Basic principles for effective food preservation: A review. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2013;1(6):84–5.

23 

Lucera A, Costa C, Conte A, Del Nobile MA. Food applications of natural antimicrobial compounds. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00287 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23060862

24 

Pawlowska AM, Zannini E, Coffey A, Arendt EK. “Green preservatives”: Combating fungi in the food and feed industry by applying antifungal lactic acid bacteria. In: Henry J, editor. Advances in food and nutrition research, vol. 66. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press; 2012. pp. 217-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394597-6.00005-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394597-6.00005-7

25 

Barberis S, Quiroga HG, Barcia C, Talia JM, Debattista N. Natural food preservatives against microorganisms In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM, editors. Food safety and preservation. London, UK: Academic Press; 2018. pp. 621-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814956-0.00020-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814956-0.00020-2

26 

Gyawali R, Ibrahim SA. Natural products as antimicrobial agents. Food Control. 2014;46:412–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.05.047

27 

Pisoschi AM, Pop A, Georgescu C, Turcuş V, Olah NK, Mathe E. An overview of natural antimicrobials role in food. . Eur J Med Chem. 2018;143:922–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.11.095 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29227932

28 

Tiwari BK, Valdramidis VP, O’Donnell CP, Muthukumarappan K, Bourke P,, Cullen PJ. Application of natural antimicrobials for food preservation. J Agric Food Chem. 2009;57(14):5987–6000. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900668n PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19548681

29 

Hayek SA, Gyawali R, Ibrahim SA. Antimicrobial natural products. In: Mendez-Vilas A, editor. Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: Science, technology and education. Badajoz, Spain: Formatex Research Center; 2013. pp. 910-21.

30 

Cole AM, Darouiche RO, Legarda D, Connell N, Diamond G. Characterization of a fish antimicrobial peptide: gene expression, subcellular localization, and spectrum of activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:2039–45. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.8.2039-2045.2000 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10898673

31 

Driessen AJM, van den Hooven HW, Kuiper W, Van de Camp M, Sahl HG, Konings RNH, et al. Mechanistic studies of lantibiotic-induced permeabilization of phospholipid vesicles. Biochemistry. 1995;34(5):1606–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00005a017 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7849020

32 

Chorianopoulos NG, Giaouris ED, Skandamis PN, Haroutounian SA, Nychas GJE. Disinfectant test against monoculture and mixed-culture biofilms composed of technological, spoilage and pathogenic bacteria: bactericidal effect of essential oil and hydrosol of Satureja thymbra and comparison with standard acid-base sanitizers. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;104:1586–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03694.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18217930

33 

Nichita C, Neagu G, Cucu A, Vulturescu V, Bertesteanu SVG. Antioxidative properties of Plantago lanceolata L. extracts evaluated by chemiluminiscence method. AgroLife Sci J. 2016;5:95–102.

34 

Hoskin DW, Ramamoorthy A. Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778:357–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18078805

35 

Aires A, Mota VR, Saavedra M, Rosa E, Bennett R. The antimicrobial effects of glucosinolates and their respective enzymatic hydrolysis products on bacteria isolated from the human intestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106(6):2086–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04180.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19291240

36 

Seifu E, Buys EM, Donkin E. Significance of the lactoperoxidase system in the dairy industry and its potential applications: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16:137–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2004.11.002

37 

Potter R, Hansen LT, Gill TA. Inhibition of foodborne bacteria by native and modified protamine: importance of electrostatic interactions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;103:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.019 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084263

38 

Ben-Shalom N, Ardi R, Pinto R, Aki C, Fallik E. Controlling gray mould caused by Botrytis cinerea in cucumber plants by means of chitosan. Crop Prot. 2003;22:285–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00149-7

39 

Fernandes JC, Tavaria FK, Soares JC, Ramos OS, Joao Monteiro M, Pintado ME, et al. Antimicrobial effects of chitosans and chitooligosaccharides, upon Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, in food model systems. Food Microbiol. 2008;25(7):922–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.05.003 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18721683

40 

Sprong RC, Hulstein MF, Van der Meer R. Bactericidal activities of milk lipids. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1298–301. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.4.1298-1301.2001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11257052

41 

Rani A, Saini KC, Bast F, Varjani S, Mehariya S, Bhatia SK, et al. A review on microbial products and their perspective application as antimicrobial agents. Biomolecules. 2021;11(12):1860. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121860 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34944505

42 

Yusuf M. Natural antimicrobial agents for food biopreservation. In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM, editors. Handbook of food bioengineering, food packaging and preservation. London, UK: Academic Press; 2008. pp. 409-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811516-9.00012-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811516-9.00012-9

43 

Ramos-Vivas J, Elexpuru-Zabaleta M, Samano ML, Barrera AP, Forbes-Hernández TY, Giampieri F, et al. Phages and enzybiotics in food biopreservation. Molecules. 2021;26(17):5138. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26175138 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34500572

44 

Fliss I, Hammami R, Lay CL. Biological control of human digestive microbiota using antimicrobial cultures and bacteriocin. In: Lacroix C. editor. Protective cultures, antimicrobial metabolites and bacteriophages for food and beverage biopreservation. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing; 2011. pp. 240–63. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090522.2.240 https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857090522.2.240

45 

Šimat V, Čagalj M, Skroza D, Gardini F, Tabanelli G, Montanari C, et al. Sustainable sources for antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds used in meat and seafood products, In: Toldrá F, editor. Advances in food and nutrition research, vol. 97. London, UK: Academic Press; 2021. pp. 55-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2021.03.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2021.03.001

46 

Françoise L. Occurrence and role of lactic acid bacteria in seafood products. Food Microbiol. 2010;27(6):698–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2010.05.016 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20630312

47 

Moradi M, Kousheh SA, Almasi H, Alizadeh A, Guimaraes JT, Yilmaz N, et al. Postbiotics produced by lactic acid bacteria: The next frontier in food safety. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020;19(6):3390–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12613 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33337065

48 

Wang Y, Wu J, Lv M, Shao Z, Hungwe M, Wang J, et al. Metabolism characteristics of lactic acid bacteria and the expanding applications in food industry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:612285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.612285 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34055755

49 

O’Connor PM, Kuniyoshi TM, Oliveira RPS, Hill C, Ross RP, Cotter PD. Antimicrobials for food and feed; a bacteriocin perspective. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;61:160–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.12.023 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31968296

50 

Parlindungan E, Lugli GA, Ventura M, van Sinderen D, Mahony J. Lactic acid bacteria diversity and characterization of probiotic candidates in fermented meats. Foods. 2021;10(7):1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10071519 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34359389

51 

Borges F, Briandet R, Callon C, Champomier-Vergès MC, Christieans S, Chuzeville S, et al. Contribution of omics to biopreservation: Toward food microbiome engineering. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:951182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.951182 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983334

52 

Stiles ME. Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1996;70(2-4):331–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395940 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8879414

53 

Cacciatore FA, Brandelli A, da Silva Malheiros P. Combining natural antimicrobials and nanotechnology for disinfecting food surfaces and control microbial biofilm formation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;61(22):3771–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1806782 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32811167

54 

Yang SC, Lin CH, Sung CT, Fang JY. Antibacterial activities of bacteriocins: Application in foods and pharmaceuticals. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00241 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24904554

55 

Yang E, Fan L, Jiang Y, Doucette C, Fillmore S. Antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from cheeses and yogurts. AMB Expr. 2012;2:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-2-48 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22963659

56 

Todorov SD, Franco BD, Wiid IJ. In vitro study of beneficial properties and safety of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Portuguese fermented meat products. Benef Microbes. 2014;5(3):351–66. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2013.0030 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24463204

57 

Settanni L, Corsetti A. Application of bacteriocins in vegetable food biopreservation. Int J Food Microbiol. 2008;121:123–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.09.001 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18022269

58 

Muccilli S, Restuccia C. Bioprotective role of yeasts. Microorganisms. 2015;3(4):588–611. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms3040588 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682107

59 

Passoth V, Schnürer J. Non-conventional yeasts in antifungal application. In: de Winde H, editor. Functional genetics of industrial yeasts. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2003. pp. 297-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37003-X_10 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-37003-X_10

60 

Suzuki C, Ando Y, Machida S. Interaction of SMKT, a killer toxin produced by Pichia farinosa, with the yeast cell membranes. Yeast. 2001;18:1471–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.791 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11748724

61 

Golubev WI. Antagonistic interactions among yeasts. In: Rosa CA, Peter G. editors. Biodiversity and ecophysiology of yeasts. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2006. pp. 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30985-3_10 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-30985-3_10

62 

Young TW, Yagiu M. A comparison of the killer character in different yeasts and its classification. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1978;44:59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00400077 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/655699

63 

Schmitt MJ, Breinig F. Yeast viral killer toxins: Lethality and self-protection. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4:212–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1347 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16489348

64 

den Besten HMW, Wells-Bennik MHJ, Zwietering MH. Natural diversity in heat resistance of bacteria and bacterial spores: impact on food safety and quality. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2018;9(1):383–410. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-030117-012808 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29580137

65 

Cebrián G, Condón S, Mañas P. Physiology of the inactivation of vegetative bacteria by thermal treatments: Mode of action, influence of environmental factors and inactivation kinetics. Foods. 2017;6:107. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6120107 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29189748

66 

Rifna EJ, Singh SK, Chakraborty S, Dwivedi M. Effect of thermal and non-thermal techniques for microbial safety in food powder: Recent advances. Food Res Int. 2019;126:108654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108654 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31732065

67 

Petruzzi L, Campaniello D, Speranza B, Corbo MR, Sinigaglia M, Bevilacqua A. Thermal treatments for fruit and vegetable juices and beverages: A literature overview. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2017;16(4):668–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12270 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33371563

68 

Bansal V, Siddiqui MW, Rahman MS. Minimally processed foods: Overview. In: Siddiqui MW, Rahman MS, editors. Minimally processed foods: Technologies for safety, quality, and convenience. New York, NY, USA: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10677-9_1 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10677-9_1

69 

Mújica-Paz H, Valdez-Fragoso A, Samson CT, Welti-Chanes J, Torres JA. High-pressure processing technologies for the pasteurization and sterilization of foods. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011;4(6):969–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0543-5

70 

Sarker MR, Akhtar S, Torres JA, Paredes-Sabja D. High hydrostatic pressure-induced inactivation of bacterial spores. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2015;41(1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.788475 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23631742

71 

Gänzle M, Liu Y. Mechanisms of pressure-mediated cell death and injury in Escherichia coli: from fundamentals to food applications. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00599 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26157424

72 

Smelt JP, Hellemons JC, Patterson M. Effects of high pressure on vegetative microorganisms. In: Hendrickx MEG, Knorr D, Ludikhuyze L, Van Loey A, Heinz V, editors. Ultra high pressure treatments of foods. Boston, MA, USA: Springer; 2001. pp. 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0723-9_3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0723-9_3

73 

Khouryieh HA. Novel and emerging technologies used by the U.S. food processing industry. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2021;67:102559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102559

74 

Wang CY, Huang HW, Hsu CP, Yang BB. Recent advances in food processing using high hydrostatic pressure technology. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56(4):527–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.745479 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25629307

75 

Morales-de la Peña M, Elez-Martínez P, Martín-Belloso O. Food preservation by pulsed electric fields: An engineering perspective. Food Eng Rev. 2011;3(2):94–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-011-9035-7

76 

Garner AL. Pulsed electric field inactivation of microorganisms: From fundamental biophysics to synergistic treatments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(19):7917–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-10067-y PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31392376

77 

García D, Gómez N, Mañas P, Raso J, Pagán R. Pulsed electric fields cause bacterial envelopes permeabilization depending on the treatment intensity, the treatment medium pH and the microorganism investigated. Int J Food Microbiol. 2007;113(2):219–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.007 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16987561

78 

Soni A, Oey I, Silcock P, Ross IK, Bremer PJ. Effect of pulsed electric field with moderate heat (80°C) on inactivation, thermal resistance and differential gene expression in B. cereus spores. J Food Process Preserv. 2020;44(7):e14503. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14503

79 

Syed QA, Ishaq A, Rahman U, Aslam S, Shukat R. Pulsed electric field technology in food preservation: A review. J Nutr Health Food Eng. 2017;6(6):168–72. https://doi.org/10.15406/jnhfe.2017.06.00219

80 

Salehi F. Physico-chemical properties of fruit and vegetable juices as affected by pulsed electric field: a review. Int J Food Prop. 2020;23(1):1036–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1775250

81 

McAuley CM, Singh TK, Haro-Maza JF, Williams R, Buckow R. Microbiological and physicochemical stability of raw, pasteurised or pulsed electric field-treated milk. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;38:365–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.09.030

82 

Dalvi-Isfahan M, Hamdami N, Le-Bail A, Xanthakis E. The principles of high voltage electric field and its application in food processing: a review. Food Res Int. 2016;89:48–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.002 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28460942

83 

Sonne AM, Grunert KG, Veflen Olsen N, Granli BS, Szabó E, Banati D. Consumers’ perceptions of HPP and PEF food products. Br Food J. 2012;114(1):85–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701211197383

84 

Chacha JS, Zhang L, Ofoedu CE, Suleiman RA, Dotto JM, Roobab U, et al. Revisiting non-thermal food processing and preservation methods - Action mechanisms, pros and cons: A technological update (2016–2021). Foods. 2021;10(6):1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061430 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34203089

85 

Farkas J, Ehlermann DAE, Mohácsi-Farkas C. Food technologies: food irradiation. In: Motarjemi Y, Moy G, Todd E, editors. Encycopledia of Food Safety. Chicago, MI, USA: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 178-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-378612-8.00259-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-378612-8.00259-6

86 

Desouky O, Ding N, Zhou G. Targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2015;8(2):247–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.003

87 

CODEX STAN 106-1983. Codex general standard for irradiated foods (CAC/RS 106-1979). Geneva, Switzerland: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization (FAO/WHO); 1983. Available from:http://siweb1.dss.go.th/standard/Fulltext/codex/CXS_106E.pdf.

88 

Farkas J, Mohácsi-Farkas C. History and future of food irradiation. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2011;22(2):121–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.04.002

89 

Ajibola OJ. An overview of irradiation as a food preservation technique. Novel Res Microbiol J. 2020;4(3):779–89. https://doi.org/10.21608/nrmj.2020.95321

90 

Sharma S, Singh RK. Cold plasma treatment of dairy proteins in relation to functionality enhancement. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2020;102:30–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.05.013

91 

Oliveira M, Prieto M, Álvarez-Ordoñez A, López M. Application of non-thermal atmospheric plasma processing in the food industry. In: Seid MJ, Nantawan T editors. Unit operations and processing equipment in the food industry, non-thermal food processing operations. Cambridge, MA, USA: Woodhead Publishing; 2023. pp. 137-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818717-3.00004-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818717-3.00004-4

92 

Calvo T, Prieto M, Alvarez-Ordóñez A, López M. Effect of non-thermal atmospheric plasma on food-borne bacterial pathogens on ready-to eat foods: morphological and physico-chemical changes occurring on the cellular envelopes. Foods. 2020;9:1865. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9121865 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327565

93 

López M, Calvo T, Prieto M, Múgica-Vidal R, Muro-Fraguas I, Alba-Elías F, et al. A review on non-thermal atmospheric plasma for food preservation: Mode of action, determinants of effectiveness, and applications. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00622 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001215

94 

Espina L, García-Gonzalo D, Pagán R. Impact of essential oils on the taste acceptance of tomato juice, vegetable soup, or poultry burgers. J Food Sci. 2014;79(8):S1575–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12529 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077550

95 

Berdejo D, Pagán E, García-Gonzalo D, Pagán R. Exploiting the synergism among physical and chemical processes for improving food safety. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2019;30:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2018.08.004

96 

Ait-Ouazzou A, Espina L, Cherrat L, Hassani M, Laglaoui A, Conchello P, et al. Synergistic combination of essential oils from Morocco and physical treatments for microbial inactivation. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2012;16:283–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2012.07.002

97 

Pagán E, Berdejo D, Espina L, García-Gonzalo D, , Pagán R. Antimicrobial activity of suspensions and nanoemulsions of citral in combination with heat or pulsed electric fields. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018;66(1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12815 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29072326

98 

Di Gregorio L, Tchuenchieu A, Poscente V, Arioli S, Del Fiore A, Costanzo M, et al. Synergistic action of mild heat and essential oil treatments on culturability and viability of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 tested in vitro and in fruit juice. Foods. 2022;11(11):1615. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11111615 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681366

99 

Guevara L, Antolinos V, Palop A, Periago PM. Impact of moderate heat, carvacrol, and thymol treatments on the viability, injury, and stress response of Listeria monocytogenes. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:548930. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/548930 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26539510

100 

Cao Y, Zhou D, Zhang X, Xiao X, Yu Y, Li X. Synergistic effect of citral and carvacrol and their combination with mild heat against Cronobacter sakazakii CICC 21544 in reconstituted infant formula. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2021;138:110617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110617

101 

Gayán E, Geens E, Berdejo D, García-Gonzalo D, Pagán R, Aertsen A, et al. Combination of mild heat and plant essential oil constituents to inactivate resistant variants of Escherichia coli in buffer and in coconut water. Food Microbiol. 2020;87:103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103388 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31948629

102 

Espina L, Berdejo D, Alfonso P, Garcia-Gonzalo D, Pagan R. Potential use of carvacrol and citral to inactivate biofilm cells and eliminate biofouling. Food Control. 2017;82:256–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.07.007

103 

de Souza Pedrosa GT, de Carvalho RJ, Berdejo D, de Souza EL, Pagán R, Magnani M. Control of autochthonous spoilage lactic acid bacteria in apple and orange juices by sensorially accepted doses of Citrus spp. essential oils combined with mild heat treatments. J Food Sci. 2019;84(4):848–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14474 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866044

104 

Bento R, Pagán E, Berdejo D, de Carvalho RJ, García-Embid S, Maggi F, et al. Chitosan nanoemulsions of cold-pressed orange essential oil to preserve fruit juices. Int J Food Microbiol. 2020;331:108786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108786 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32659617

105 

Merino N, Berdejo D, Bento R, Salman H, Lanz M, Maggi F, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav. essential oil loaded in self-assembled zein nanoparticles in combination with heat. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;133:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.003

106 

Kim SS, Kang DH. Combination treatment of ohmic heating with various essential oil components for inactivation of food-borne pathogens in buffered peptone water and salsa. Food Control. 2017;80:29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.001

107 

Targino de Souza Pedrosa G, Pimentel TC, Gavahian M, Lucena de Medeiros L, Pagán R, Magnani M. The combined effect of essential oils and emerging technologies on food safety and quality. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2021;147:111593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111593

108 

Espina L, García-Gonzalo D, Laglaoui A, Mackey BM, Pagán R. Synergistic combinations of high hydrostatic pressure and essential oils or their constituents and their use in preservation of fruit juices. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;161(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.11.015 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23246609

109 

de Carvalho RJ, de Souza GT, Pagán E, García-Gonzalo D, Magnani M, Pagán R. Nanoemulsions of Mentha piperita L. essential oil in combination with mild heat, pulsed electric fields (PEF) and high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) as an alternative to inactivate Escherichia coli O157: H7 in fruit juices. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2018;48:219–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.07.004

110 

Sanz-Puig M, Moreno P, Consuelo Pina-Perez M, Rodrigo D, Martinez A. Combined effect of high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) and antimicrobial from agro-industrial by-products against S. Typhimurium. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2017;77:126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.031

111 

Chien SY, Sheen S, Sommers C, Sheen LY. Combination effect of high-pressure processing and essential oil (Melissa officinalis extracts) or their constituents for the inactivation of Escherichia coli in Ground Beef. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2019;12(3):359–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-018-2211-5

112 

Bleoanca I, Saje K, Mihalcea L, Oniciuc E-A, Smole-Mozina S, Nicolau AI, Borda D. Contribution of high pressure and thyme extract to control Listeria monocytogenes in fresh cheese - a hurdle approach. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;38(Part A):7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.09.002

113 

Li H, Ganzle M. Effect of hydrostatic pressure and antimicrobials on survival of Listeria monocytogenes and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli in beef. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;38:321–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.05.003

114 

Wang LH, Wang MS, Zeng XA, Zhang ZH, Gong DM, Huang YB. Membrane destruction and DNA binding of Staphylococcus aureus cells induced by carvacrol and its combined effect with a pulsed electric field. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(32):6355–63. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02507 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27420472

115 

Sanz-Puig M, Santos-Carvalho L, Cunha LM, Consuelo Pina-Perez M, Martinez A, Rodrigo D. Effect of pulsed electric fields (PEF) combined with natural antimicrobial by-products against S. Typhimurium. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2016;37:322–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.09.004

116 

Wang MS, Wang LH, Bekhit AEDA, Yang J, Hou ZP, Wang YZ, et al. A review of sublethal effects of pulsed electric field on cells in food processing. J Food Eng. 2018;223:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.11.035

117 

Somolinos M, Garcia D, Condon S, Mackey B, Pagan R. Inactivation of Escherichia coli by citral. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108(6):1928–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04597.x PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19891710

118 

Clemente I, Condón-Abanto S, Pedrós-Garrido S, Whyte P, Lyng JG. Efficacy of pulsed electric fields and antimicrobial compounds used alone and in combination for the inactivation of Campylobacter jejuni in liquids and raw chicken. Food Control. 2020;107:106491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.01.017

119 

Ji J, Shankar S, Salmieri S, Lacroix M. Combined effects of microencapsulated essential oils and γ-irradiation on microbiological and physicochemical properties of dry fermented sausages during ripening and storage. Food Control. 2022;133:108624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108624

120 

Begum T, Follett PA, Hossain F, Christopher L, Salmieri S, Lacroix M. Microbicidal effectiveness of irradiation from gamma and X-ray sources at different dose rates against the foodborne illness pathogens Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in rice. Lebensm Wiss Technol. 2020;132:109841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109841

121 

Shankar S, Follett P, Ayari S, Hossain F, Salmieri S, Lacroix M. Microbial radiosensitization using combined treatments of essential oils and irradiation- part B: Comparison between gamma-ray and X-ray at different dose rates. Microb Pathog. 2020;143:104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104118 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32147410

122 

Abdeldaiem MH, Mohammad HG, Ramadan MF. Improving the quality of silver carp fish fillets by gamma irradiation and coatings containing rosemary oil. J Aquat Food Prod Technol. 2018;27(5):568–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2018.1461157

123 

Hossain F, Follett P, Salmieri S, Vu KD, Fraschini C, Lacroix M. Antifungal activities of combined treatments of irradiation and essential oils (EOs) encapsulated chitosan nanocomposite films in in vitro and in situ conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019;295:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.02.009 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30784857

124 

Ayari S, Dussault D, Jerbi T, Hamdi M, Lacroix M. Radiosensitization of Bacillus cereus spores in minced meat treated with cinnamaldehyde. Radiat Phys Chem. 2012;81:1173–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.02.022

125 

Matan N, Nisoa M, Matan N. Antibacterial activity of essential oils and their main components enhanced by atmospheric RF plasma. Food Control. 2014;39:97–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.10.030

126 

Getnet TG, da Silva GF, Duarte S, Kayama ME, Rangel EC, Cruz NC. Atmospheric pressure plasma chemical vapor deposition of carvacrol thin films on stainless steel to reduce the formation of E. coli and S. aureus biofilms. Materials (Basel). 2020;13:3166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143166 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32679884

127 

Münch M, Guillard V, Gaucel S, Destercke S, Thévenot J, Buche P. Composition-based statistical model for predicting CO2 solubility in modified atmosphere packaging application. J Food Eng. 2023;340:111283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111283

128 

Mastromatteo M, Conte A, Del Nobile MA. Combined use of modified atmosphere packaging and natural compounds for food preservation. Food Eng Rev. 2010;2:28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-010-9013-5

129 

Maqsood S, Benjakul S. Preventive effect of tannic acid in combination with modified atmospheric packaging on the quality losses of the refrigerated ground beef. Food Control. 2010;21:1282–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.02.018

130 

Bouarab-Chibane L, Ouled-Bouhedda B, Leonard L, Gemelas L, Bouajila J, Ferhout H. et al. Preservation of fresh ground beef patties using plant extracts combined with a modified atmosphere packaging. Eur Food Res Technol. 2017;243(11):1997–2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-2905-3

131 

Liang Z, Veronica V, Huang J, Zhang P, Fang Z. Combined effects of plant food processing by-products and high oxygen modified atmosphere packaging on the storage stability of beef patties. Food Control. 2022;133:108586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108586

132 

Yang XY, Xu BC, Lei HM, Luo X, Zhu LX, Zhang YM, et al. Effects of grape seed extract on meat color and premature browning of meat patties in high-oxygen packaging. J Integr Agric. 2022;21(8):2445–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63854-6

133 

Cao Y, Warner RD, Fang Z. Effect of chitosan/nisin/gallic acid coating on preservation of pork loin in high oxygen modified atmosphere packaging. Food Control. 2019;101:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.02.013

134 

Soriano A, Alañón ME, Alarcón M, García-Ruíz A, Díaz-Maroto MC, Pérez-Coello MS. Oak wood extracts as natural antioxidants to increase shelf life of raw pork patties in modified atmosphere packaging. Food Res Int. 2018;111:524–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.055 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30007715

135 

Rocchetti G, Bernardo L, Pateiro M, Barba FJ, Munekata PES, Trevisan M, et al. Impact of a pitanga leaf extract to prevent lipid oxidation processes during shelf life of packaged pork burgers: an untargeted metabolomic approach. Foods. 2020;9:1668. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111668 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203110

136 

Lahmar A, Morcuende D, Andrade MJ, Chekir-Ghediraa L, Estévez M. Prolonging shelf life of lamb cutlets packed under high-oxygen modified atmosphere by spraying essential oils from North-African plants. Meat Sci. 2018;139:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.01.015 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29413677

137 

Kahraman T, Issa G, Altunatmaz SS, Kahraman BB, Aksu F, Aydin A, et al. Effects of oregano essential oil, grapefruit seed extract and their combination on the growth and survival of Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in poultry fillets under modified atmosphere packaging. Slov Vet Res. 2016;53(1):5–12.

138 

Alakomi HL, Maukonen J, Honkapää K, Storgårds E, Quirin KW, Yang B, et al. Effect of plant antimicrobial agents containing marinades on storage stability and microbiological quality of broiler chicken cuts packed with modified atmosphere packaging. J Food Prot. 2017;80(10):1689–96. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-076 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28885049

139 

Ranucci D, Roila R, Andoni E, Braconi R, Branciari R. Punica granatum and Citrus spp. extract mix affects spoilage microorganisms growth rate in vacuum-packaged cooked sausages made from pork meat, Emmer Wheat (Triticum dicoccum Schübler), almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) and hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). Foods. 2019;8:664. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8120664 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835622

140 

Olatunde OO, Benjakul S, Vongkamjan K. Cold plasma combined with liposomal ethanolic coconut husk extract: A potential hurdle technology for shelf-life extension of Asian sea bass slices packaged under modified atmosphere. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2020;65:102448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102448

141 

Atrea I, Papavergou A, Amvrosiadis I, Savvaidis IN. Combined effect of vacuum-packaging and oregano essential oil on the shelf-life of Mediterranean octopus (Octopus vulgaris) from the Aegean Sea stored at 4°C. Food Microbiol. 2009;26:166–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2008.10.005 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19171258

142 

Frangos L, Pyrgotou N, Giatrakou V, Ntzimani A, Savvaidis IN. Combined effects of salting, oregano oil and vacuum-packaging on the shelf-life of refrigerated trout fillets. Food Microbiol. 2010;27:115–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.09.002 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19913701

143 

Mahdavi E, Ariaii P. Effect of natural antioxidants and vegetable fiber on quality properties of fish sausage produced from Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Ital J Food Sci. 2021;33:117–26. https://doi.org/10.15586/ijfs.v33iSP1.2059

144 

Falleh H, Ben Jemaa M, Saada M, Ksouri R. Essential oils: A promising eco-friendly food preservative. Food Chem. 2020;330:127268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127268 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32540519

145 

Oulahal N, Degraeve P. Phenolic-rich plant extracts with antimicrobial activity: An alternative to food preservatives and biocides? Front Microbiol. 2022;12:753518. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.753518 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058892

146 

Perricone M, Arsace E, Corbo MR, Sinigaglia M, Bevilacqua A. Bioactivity of essential oils: A review on their interaction with food components. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00076 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709605

147 

Bouarab-Chibane L, Forquet V, Clément Y, Lanteri P, Bordes C, Bouajila J, et al. Effect of interactions of plant phenolics with bovine meat proteins on their antibacterial activity. Food Control. 2018;90:189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.03.006

148 

Bouarab-Chibane L, Oulahal N, Dumas E, Trinh Thi Thanh N, Bouajila J, Souchard JP, et al. Effect of interaction with food constituents on plant extracts antibacterial activity. Food Sci Appl Biotechnol. 2018;1(1):72–80. https://doi.org/10.30721/fsab2018.v1.i1.27

149 

Kurek M, Moundanga S, Favier C, Galic K, Debeaufort F. Antimicrobial efficiency of carvavrol vapour related to mass partition coefficient when incorporated in chitosan-based films aimed for active packaging. Food Control. 2013;32:168–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.11.049

150 

Kurek M, Guinault A, Voilley A, Galic K, Debeaufort F. Effect of relative humidity on carvacrol release and permeation properties of chitosan-based films and coatings. Food Chem. 2014;144:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.132 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24099536

151 

Batiha GES, Hussein DE, Algammal AM, George TT, Jeandet P, Al-Snafi AE, et al. Application of natural antimicrobials in food preservation: Recent views. Food Control. 2021;126:108066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108066

152 

Basavegowda N, Baek KH. Synergistic antioxidant and antibacterial advantages of essential oils for food packaging applications. Biomolecules. 2021;11(9):1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11091267 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34572479

153 

Denkova-Kostova RS, Goranov BG, Teneva DG, Tomova TG, Denkova ZR, Shopska V, et al. Bio-preservation of chocolate mousse with free and immobilized cells of Lactobacillus plantarum D2 and lemon (Citrus lemon L.) or grapefruit (Citrus paradisi L.) zest essential oils. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2021;20(1):5–16. https://doi.org/10.17306/J.AFS.2021.0872 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33449515

154 

Teneva D, Denkova Z, Denkova-Kostova R, Goranov B, Kostov G, Slavchev A, et al. Biological preservation of mayonnaise with Lactobacillus plantarum LBRZ12, dill, and basil essential oils. Food Chem. 2021;344:128707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128707 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33267985

155 

Goranov B, Teneva D, Denkova-Kostova R, Shopska V, Oulahal N, Denkova Z, et al. Biopreservation of chocolate mousse with Lactobacillus helveticus 2/20: Microbial challenge test. Molecules. 2022;27(17):5631. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175631 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36080398


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.