Original scientific paper
Satisfaction with Education and Self-Evaluation of Students’ Competency in Helping Professions
Neven Ricijaš
Aleksandra Huić
Vanja Branica
Abstract
This paper presents results of a preliminary investigation conducted on three university groups. Students’ satisfaction with their
education, their professional interests and the self-evaluation of their competence for future psychosocial work were examined.
The goal of this research was to compare students of three helping professions (social pedagogy, psychology and social work),
with regard to perceived competency for the future psychosocial work and obtain insight in the degree of satisfaction with the
general and specific knowledge and skills for psychosocial work obtained during study and compulsory student practice.A total of
227 final year students participated in the study (two generations), out of which 88 psychology students, 80 social work students
and 59 social pedagogy students were involved. Data on students’ satisfaction with general and specific knowledge and skills
gained through their education, student practice, volunteer work and specific professional interests were gathered. A preliminary
version of the Perceived competency for future psychosocial work scale was also administered. Participants assessed how sure
they are that they can professionally/successfully perform certain activities in the domain of psychosocial work (common to all
three investigated professions). Also, the Perceived incompetence scale (Bezinovic, 1988) was administered. Results show that
students are mainly satisfied with the general and specific knowledge and skills gained through their education, although there
are some differences between the university groups. Out of all the students that participated in the study, 47% is or were included
in some form of volunteer work, and they believe that this experience has enabled them to gain new job-skills. Factor analysis of
the Perceived competency for future psychosocial work scale revealed four factors: (1) direct work in practice; (2) group work/
prevention programs, (3) empathy and establishing a relationship with a client and (4) application of theoretical knowledge in
practice. Differences between three university groups considering students’ satisfaction with the knowledge and skills gained,
their volunteer work and their perception of competency for their future work within the psychosocial domain are discussed.
Keywords
competencies; psychosocial work; study; social pedagogy; social work; psychology
Hrčak ID:
16740
URI
Publication date:
1.10.2006.
Visits: 7.566 *