Dual-Use Dwellings – Historical Overview

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31522/p.32.2(68).11

Keywords:

Dual-use dwelling, living/working, multi-residential developments, work from home

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 forced many employees to work from home, and since then, remote work has remained a prominent topic. From an architectural point of view living and working in the same space is a complex issue that challenges the boundaries between private and shared spaces, productive and reproductive work, the home and the city. To address how workspaces can be integrated into residential buildings today, examining the historical background of dualused dwellings is essential. This paper analyzes historical forms of work from home settlements and purposely built dual-use dwellings, with a focus on identifying their basic characteristics, the degree of overlap between living and working spaces, and their relationship with the immediate surroundings. The results show three historical types of dual-use dwellings: integrated into the neighborhood, within the building community, and in the housing unit. With the digital revolution, the high demand for remote work jobs, and a growing interest in work-life balance, it is evident that there is a growing need for further research on the integration of dual-used dwellings within multiresidential developments.

References

Aureli, P.V. (2011) ‘Labor and Architecture: Revisiting Cedric Price’s Potteries Thinkbelt’, Log, (23), pp. 97-118.

Aureli, P.V. and Tattara, M. (2015) ‘Production/ Reproduction: Housing beyond the Family’, Family Planing, Harvard Design Magazine. No 41 F/W Available at: https://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/articles/production-reproduction-housing-beyond-the-family/ (Accessed: 17 July 2024)

Aureli, P.V. and Tattara, M. (2018) ‘Communal Villa. Production and Reproduction in Artists’ Housing’, ARQ (Santiago), (98), pp. 44-53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-69962018000100044

Aureli, P.V. and Tattara, M. (2022) Living and working. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Baraona Pohl, E. (2017) ‘Cooperative housing as a means more than an end’. In: Kries, M. et al. (Eds.) Together! The New Architecture of the Collective, Vitra Design Museum and Ruby Press, pp. 344-348

Beardsley, S. (2022) Meta goes remote to capture EU talent. DW.com. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/meta-turns-to-remotework-as-it-expands-across-europe/a-60390423 (Accessed: 21 July 2024).

Bloom, N. et al. (2015) ‘Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), pp. 165-218. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032

Bonenberg, A. and Lucchini, M. (2022) ‘Home Office: Working and Studying Spaces in Residential Interiors during and after Forced Social Isolation’, Housing Environment, (39), pp. 98-109. https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.016.16594

Bradshaw, R. (2024) Surprising Working From Home Productivity Statistics, Apollo Technical LLC. Available at: https://www.apollotechnical.com/working-from-home-productivity-statistics/ (Accessed: 21 July 2024).

Brownell, B. (2024) An Interview with Pritzker Prize winner Riken Yamamoto, Architect. Available at: https://www.architectmagazine.com/practice/an-interview-with-pritzker-prize-winner-riken-yamamoto_o (Accessed: 17 July 2024).

Caruso, A. (2014) ‘A short history of the development of the office explained in terms of the economic and social context of the last 100 years’, Workforce : a better place to work, 43, pp. 122-143.

Dangschat, J.S. (2022) ‘What does digitalization do to society?’, New Social Housing. Positions on IBA_Vienna 2022., Jovis Verlag GmbH, Berlin, pp. 148-151.

Davis, H. (2012) Living Over the Store: Architecture and Local Urban Life, Routledge & CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203609590 Eurofound and the International Labor Office (2017), Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, and the International Labor Office, Geneva.

Gausa, M. (2003) The Metapolis Dictionary of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the Information Age. Actar.

Habraken, N.J. (1962) Supports: An Alternative to Mass Housing. 1st edition, Routledge.

Heckmann, O. and Zapel, E. (2017) ‘A Chronicle of Developments in Housing’, Floor Plan Manual Housing, fifth, revised and expanded edition, Birkhäuser, pp. 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035611496-003

Holliss, F. (2007) The workhome... a new building type? Doctoral thesis. London Metropolitan University. Available at: https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/7634/ (Accessed: 6 March 2024).

Holliss, F. (2012) ‘Space, Buildings and the Life Worlds of Home-Based Workers: Towards Better Design’, Sociological Research Online, 17(2), p. 24. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2691

Holliss, F. (2015) Beyond Live/Work: The Architecture of Home-based Work. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738048

Judes, A.; Schwellnus, C.; Ciminelli, G.; Koelle, M.; Adrjan, P., and Sinclair, T. (2021) Will Remote Work Persist after the Pandemic? Indeed Hiring Lab. Available at: https://www.hiringlab.org/2021/12/16/will-remote-workpersist-after-the-pandemic/ (Accessed: 21 July 2024).

Junestrand, S. and Tollmar, K. (1998) ‘The Dwelling as a Place for Work’. In: Streitz, N.A.; Konomi, S., and Burkhardt, H.-J. (eds) Cooperative Buildings: Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 230-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69706-3_23

Kuropka, N. (2022) ‘Coworking spaces in a housing environment - case study’, Housing Environment, (41), pp. 39-49. https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.22.029.17152

Leupen, B. (2006) Frame and generic space. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.

Leupen, B. (2013) ‘Polyvalence, a concept for the sustainable dwelling’, Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 19(3), pp. 23-31.

Levy Bencostta, M. (2023) History and Modern Architecture: Prellerhaus, the Bauhaus residential colleges in Dessau (1926-1932). Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 10(1), pp. 51-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/ete.617

Lipnjak, G. (2012) ‘Rad od kuće - zakonske odredbe, kategorije, prednosti i nedostaci’, Sigurnost: časopis za sigurnost u radnoj i životnoj okolini, 54(1), pp. 21-27.

Lockhart Milan, G. (2023) ‘The architecture of the (post) studio: Jackson Pollock’s barn and Andy Warhol’s Silver Factory’, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12(2), pp. 266-276. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.11.001.

López-Igual, P. and Rodríguez-Modroño, P. (2020) ‘Who is Teleworking and Where from? Exploring the Main Determinants of Telework in Europe’, Sustainability, 12(21), p. 8797. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218797

McGee, B.L.; Couillou, R.J. and Maalt, K. (2023) ‘Work from Home: Lessons Learned and Implications for Post-pandemic Workspaces’, Interiority, 6(1), pp. 91-114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7454/in.v6i1.259

Medar, K. and Čurčić, A. (2021) ‘Cohousing and coliving - comparative analysis of two alternative housing typologies by reviewing contemporary trends’, Facta universitatis - series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 19, pp. 81-92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE210329007M.

Milasi, S.; González-Vázquez, I. and Fernández-Macías, E. (2021) Telework before the COVID-19 pandemic: Trends and drivers of differences across the EU. Paris: OECD. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/d5e42dd1-en.

Mozas, J. (2014) ‘The liquid nature of workspace’, Workforce: a better place to work, 43, pp. 4-21.

Murillo, C. and D’Atri, A. (2018, September) Producing and Reproducing: Capitalism’s Dual Oppression of Women. Left Voice Magazine. https://www.leftvoice.org/on-reproductive-labor-wage-slavery-and-the-new-working-class (16.7.2024.) with citation from: Bhattacharya, T. (2017) ‘Mapping Social Reproduction Theory’, Social Reproduction Theory, London: Pluto Press, p. 2.

Papas, T.; Basbas, S. and Campisi, T. (2023) ‘Urban mobility evolution and the 15-minute city model: from holistic to bottom-up approach’, Transportation Research Procedia, 69, pp. 544-551. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.206.

Pratt, A.C. (2012) Factory, Studio, Loft: there goes the neighborhood? In: Baum, M., and Christiaanse, K. (Eds.), City as Loft: Adaptive Reuse as a Resource for Sustainable Urban Development, pp. 25-31, Zürich: gta Verlag.

Rappaport, N. (2019) Vertical Urban Factory. 2nd edition. New York: Actar Publishers.

Reuschke, D. and Domecka M. (2018) Policy Brief on Home-Based Businesses, OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, no. 11, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Sim, D. (2019) Soft City: Building Density for Everyday Life. Washington: Island Press.

Terranova, T. (2000) Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy, Social Text, 18(2), pp. 33-58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-18-2_63-33.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Relić, T. and Baletić, B. (2024) “Dual-Use Dwellings – Historical Overview”, Prostor, 32(2(68), pp. 320–331. doi: 10.31522/p.32.2(68).11.

Issue

Section

Scientific Subject Review

Most read articles by the same author(s)