FEW PROCEDURAL INSTITUTES OF ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTE IN COMPARATIVE LAW: HOW TO IMPROVE THE CROATIAN ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTE?

Authors

  • Dario Đerđa Faculty of Law University of Rijeka, Croatia
  • David Kryska Faculty of Law Charles Univesity, Prague, Czech

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.1.3

Keywords:

administrative dispute; composition of the court; oral hearing; judicial powers; appeal; Croatia; Slovenia; Czech Republic; Poland

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to compare several procedural institutes of the administrative dispute in Croatia, Slovenia, Czech Republic and Poland. By comparing equivalent institutes in the mentioned states, we try to determine the extent to which the administrative dispute in Croatia has met the standards of legal protection of the rights and legal interests of individuals. Special attention is given to the organisation of the courts adjudicating administrative disputes, composition of these courts, equality of arms, judicial powers in adjudication and regular legal remedies in administrative disputes. The conclusions in this paper aim to improve the regulation of administrative dispute in Croatia in terms of proposing possible future amendments.

Published

2020-11-05

How to Cite

Đerđa, D., & Kryska, D. (2020). FEW PROCEDURAL INSTITUTES OF ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTE IN COMPARATIVE LAW: HOW TO IMPROVE THE CROATIAN ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTE?. Collected Papers of the Law Faculty of the University of Rijeka, 39(1), 91–124. https://doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.39.1.3