Izvorni znanstveni članak
RESPONSIBILITY FOR LIFE IN THE CONTEXT OF BIOETHICAL ISSUES
Ivan Cifrić
Sažetak
In this paper the author analyses the responsibility for life in the context of bioethical issues. The author stands for the hypothesis that the correlation between perception and ‘responsibility for life’ as well as view on a series of other issues
shape specific ‘profiles’ of responsibility for life.
Opinion poll research has been carried out in April of 2005, at five faculties of the University of Zagreb, on the occasional
sample of 492 respondents of the first and final year of study.
Prior to this, two factors have been established, ‘responsibility only for human life’ (F1) – anthropocentric responsibility
and ‘responsibility for all life’ (F2) – biocentric responsibility, which are in correlation with the factors obtained
with the instruments by means of which a public opinion has been investigated, on ‘death and the meaning of life’, ‘biocentrism’,
‘social and environmental orientations’, ‘belief’, ‘cloning’, ‘donating human organs’, ‘genetic engineering’, and
on assertions on the ‘status of human embryo’ and ‘euthanasia’. Correlations of factor structures have shown the following:
Anthropocentric responsibility is connected with the following factors: ‘individualism’, ‘autonomy of nature’, anthropocentrism’,
‘cosmic religion’ and ‘superstition – stereotypes’, ‘genetic creation of a super‐human’, and those who more
incline to this opinion are male persons and university students at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval
Architecture. Biocentric responsibility is connected with the following factors: ‘the meaning of life in believing in God’
and ‘meaning of life in a community’, ‘respect for life’ and ‘protection of life’, then ‘eco‐centrism’, ‘Christian belief’ and
the ‘ban of cloning’. Respondents of ‘right‐leaning’ political orientation, university students of the first year of study and
students at the Theological Faculty, are more inclined to the above‐mentioned opinions.
The analysis has shown that there are two ‘profiles’ of responsibility for life, that are deducible from the connection of
dimensions of responsibility for life with dimensions of some other bioethical issues. So, in this way the existence of two
bioethical orientations – anthropocentric and biocentric ‐ is being well‐argumented.
Ključne riječi
anthropocentrism; bioethics; donating organs; eco‐centrism; euthanasia; genetic engineering; cloning; responsibility for life; the meaning of life; death; status of human embryo; believing
Hrčak ID:
9125
URI
Datum izdavanja:
20.12.2005.
Posjeta: 5.637 *