Izvorni znanstveni članak
Scientific Antirealists Have Set Fire to Their Own Houses
Seungbae Park
orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-9700
; Division of General Studies - Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
Sažetak
Scientific antirealists run the argument from underconsideration against
scientific realism. I argue that the argument from underconsideration backfires on antirealists’ positive philosophical theories, such as the contextual theory of explanation (van Fraassen, 1980), the English model of rationality (van Fraassen, 1989), the evolutionary explanation of the success of science (Wray, 2008, 2012), and explanatory idealism (Khalifa, 2013). Antirealists strengthen the argument from underconsideration with the pessimistic induction against current scientific theories. In response, I construct a pessimistic induction against antirealists that since antirealists generated problematic philosophical theories in the past, they must be generating problematic philosophical theories now.
Ključne riječi
Antirealism; argument from underconsideration; epistemic privilege; pessimistic inductions; realism
Hrčak ID:
187575
URI
Datum izdavanja:
15.6.2017.
Posjeta: 1.366 *