Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izlaganje sa skupa

AN AUDIT TO IDENTIFY FACTORS AFFECTING RESPONSE TO TREATMENT AMONG DEPRESSED PATIENTS WHO HAVE DOCUMENTED SUICIDAL IDEATION/ATTEMPTS IN A BEDFORDSHIRE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH TEAM

Clare Holt ; Foundation Programme East Anglian Deanery, UK
Mark Agius Agius ; South Essex Partnership University Foundation NHS Trust UK ;Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
Sophie Butler ; Foundation Programme East Anglian Deanery, UK
Rashid Zaman ; South Essex Partnership University Foundation NHS Trust UK ;Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 270 Kb

str. 63-67

preuzimanja: 63

citiraj


Sažetak

Introduction: In recent years there has been a general move towards treating depressed patients in the community if at all
possible. One factor that may reduce the likelihood of discharge from secondary care is suicidality (Butler et al. 2010). The aim of
this audit was to identify factors associated with continued suicidality among patients in a CMHT.
Subjects and methods: We searched an anonymised database of patients and identified all those with previously documented
suicidal thoughts or attempts. We also noted the presence of factors such as alcohol problems, drug problems, augmentation therapy
and ‘other risk’ factors (e.g. financial problems or homelessness). We then looked at clinical notes to find out whether or not,
according to the latest clinic letter, patients were still reporting suicidality. This facilitated comparison of the aforementioned factors
between the group of patients in which suicidality was still present (group N) and the group of patients in which suicidality was no
longer a feature (group Y).
Results: Of the 56 patients with suicidal thoughts or attempts there were 44 in group N (79%) and 12 in group Y (21%). Overall,
alcohol problems, drug problems and ‘other’ risk factors were proportionally more common among group Y than group N, although
sometimes the difference was marginal. Conversely, the percentage of patients on augmentation therapy was greater in group N than
group Y. When considering individual diagnostic categories the above trends generally stood for the F32 category, although not
necessarily for the F33 category.
Discussion: The audit provides an insight into the sorts of factors that might influence outcomes among depressed patients.
However, there are limitations to the audit such as small sample size and lack of a fixed follow-up period.
Conclusions: Although the results are suggestive, it is difficult to make firm conclusions about patient outcomes on the basis of
this data. The audit provides a useful starting point, especially in considering the treatment of patients within the BECMHT.
However, further research on a wider scale is required before more general conclusions can be made about factors influencing
response to treatment among depressed patients.

Ključne riječi

depression; risk factors; suicidality; substance abuse; alcohol; abuse; augmentation strategies

Hrčak ID:

262377

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/262377

Datum izdavanja:

14.9.2010.

Posjeta: 195 *