Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

POSTOPERATIVE INFECTIONS AFTER POSTERIOR SPONDYLODESIS OF THORACIC AND LUMBAL SPINE. SURGICAL SPINE INFECTIONS

Mirza Bišćević ; Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Clinical Center, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Šejla Bišćević ; Department for Physiatry, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Farid Ljuca ; Medical Faculty, University of Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Barbara UR Smrke ; Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia
Ferid Krupić ; Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Ćamil Habul ; Department of Orthopedics, Canton Hospital "Dr Safet Mujić", Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 391 Kb

str. 26-30

preuzimanja: 119

citiraj


Sažetak

Background: Postoperative infection after posterior spondylodesis of thoracic and lumbal spine is the most common
complication, and a reason for revision surgery. Aim of this work is to analyze rate of postoperative spine infections at our
institution, and to determine eventual risk factors.
Subjects and methods: In our paper we analyze incidence of deep surgical infections after posterior spondylodesis, performed
on our Spine department during last 5 years (September 1, 2008 – September 1, 2013). Including criteria were: posterior spondylodesis
with transpedicular screws from Th1 to S2 due to different spine indications (injuries, degenerations, deformities, tumors),
absence of local or general infection prior the index surgery, surgery performed by the same surgeon (MB). Excluding criteria were:
needle procedures (kypho/vertebro-plasties, nerve root and faset blocades), anterior spine surgeries, cervical spine surgeries, and
decompresive surgeries.
Results: One hundred sixty five patients with 183 surgeries have been included in this study. Early surgical infection (within a
month after the surgery) has appeared at five patients (2.7%). There have been no late surgical infections. Analyzing patients’
charts, we have found that Meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA) have caused infections in two patients, while Clebisiela pneumoniae ESBL has caused infection in one patient. Those five
patients with infections have had further risk factors: long preoperative hospitalization at four patients, polytrauma, diabetes and
advanced age at one patient, each. Three patients with postoperative infection had completely non-titanium surface of implants, and
other two had about 20% of non-titanium implant surface, although vast majority of surgeries have been performed by implants
whose surface was completely titanium alloy. Infections have appeared between 10-30 postoperative days. In two patients where
revision surgeries (debridement, drainage, antibiotic according the species) had been performed in two weeks after appearance of
infection, infections have been cured. In three patients where revisions had been postponed for longer than two weeks, additional
surgeries (removal of implants) were necessary for curing the infections.
Conclusions: This study presented that rate of infection, microbiological species and risk factors are similar to the other
orthopedics procedures and other institutions. Early revision is preferable, since it effectively avoids implant removal.

Ključne riječi

posterior spondylodesis; spine; infection; treatment

Hrčak ID:

265248

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/265248

Datum izdavanja:

5.11.2014.

Posjeta: 319 *