Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Acta stomatologica Croatica : International journal of oral sciences and dental medicine, Vol. 42 No. 2, 2008.

Izvorni znanstveni članak

The Leakage of Apexit Plus and GuttaFlow Sealers

Ivan Malić ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Ivana Miletić ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Sonja Pezelj Ribarić ; Studij stomatologija, Medicinski fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci, Rijeka, Hrvatska
Zita Blažić Potočki ; Stomatološka poliklinika Zagreb, Hrvatska
Ivica Anić ; Zavod za endodonciju i restaurativnu stomatologiju, Stomatološki fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska

Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 152 Kb

str. 140-146

preuzimanja: 654

citiraj

Puni tekst: engleski pdf 152 Kb

str. 140-146

preuzimanja: 751

citiraj

Sažetak

Objectives: To compare the leakage of two root canal sealers, Apexit Plus and GuttaFlow. Materials and Methods: For the purpose of the research, 26 single-rooted extracted permanent teeth were used. Root canals of all the samples were prepared using ProTaper rotary fi les. Teeth prepared and instrumented were divided into two groups of 10 teeth. The fi rst group was obturated using the technique of cold lateral condensation, with the use of gutta-percha points and Apexit Plus sealer. The second group was obturated with the GuttaFlow. Six samples were used as a control group. The leakage of root canal fi lling on samples was examined by the use of fl uid-transport model, 24h after the obturation and thermocycling. Results and Conclusion: Statistically analyzed results of the research have shown that GuttaFlow obturated signifi cantly better than Apexit Plus 24h after the obturation procedure and after the thermocycling (both comparisons: Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, p<0,0002). In samples obturated with Apexit Plus root canal sealer, there was a statistically signifi cant difference in leakage 24h after the fi lling and after the thermocycling (p=0.011), which was insignifi cant for GuttaFlow (Friedman ANOVA, p=0.739). Under the conditions of this study, GuttaFlow provided a better seal than Apexit Plus.

Ključne riječi

GuttaFlow; Apexit Plus; Fluid Transport Model; Dental Pulp Cavity; Root Canal Filling Materials

Hrčak ID:

25851

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/25851

Datum izdavanja:

15.6.2008.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 2.865 *