Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Sažetak sa skupa

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2023.129

The importance of strain and stiffness index in the assessment of the function and structure of the left atrium

Krešimir Šutalo orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-0719-0065 ; General Hospital “Dr. T. Bardek“, Koprivnica, Croatia
Ana Šutalo orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-6362 ; University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia
Renato Filjar orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7040-9931 ; University of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering, Rijeka, Croatia


Puni tekst: engleski pdf 154 Kb

verzije

str. 129-129

preuzimanja: 68

citiraj

Preuzmi JATS datoteku


Sažetak

Ključne riječi

left atrial size and function; left atrial strain; atrial stiffness index

Hrčak ID:

301153

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/301153

Datum izdavanja:

27.4.2023.

Posjeta: 212 *



Introduction: Assessment of left atrial size and function is a routine part of any echocardiographic examination. These parameters reflect volume and/or pressure load, pathology of the left ventricle, arrhythmias, storage diseases, and congenital heart defects (1). The presented research aims to evaluate the significance of the atrial stiffness index (ASI) and left atrial strain (LAS) in assessing the function and structure of the left atrium.

Patients and Methods: The analysis was performed using statistical methods applied on the observations of 57 male individuals split into three groups: G1 (22 healthy individuals), G2 (25 patients with arterial hypertension), and G3 (10 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction). All subjects were in sinus rhythm and without a significant degree of calcification of the mitral annulus. Patients underwent classical echocardiographic examination along with 2D speckle tracking analysis.Variable observations related to group pairs (G1-G2, G1-G3, G2-G3) were statistically analyzed using t-test for differences of means and F-test for analysis of variance.

Results: Statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between means was found for all group pairs for ASI and reservoir LAS, while latter showed p<0.05 for difference between variance as well. Median ASI value was 0.28 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.2-0.31), 0.44 (IQR 0.35-0.7), and 1.66 (IQR 0.91-2.77) for G1, G2 and G3 respectively, measured in mmHg/ml. Median reservoir LAS value (average of two and four chamber views) was 29.75% (IQR 27.87-33.73), 24.13% (IQR 20.32-27.57), and 14.39% (IQR 9.12-18.24) for G1, G2 and G3 respectively.

Conclusion: ASI and reservoir LAS showed significant difference in patient subgroups. Taking that into account, it is reasonable to include them in everyday echocardiographic practice for diagnosis both clinical and subclinical cardiac dysfunction.

LITERATURE

1 

Smiseth OA, Baron T, Marino PN, Marwick TH, Flachskampf FA. Imaging of the left atrium: patophysiology insights and clinical utility. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 December 18;23(1):2–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeab191 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34601594


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.