Pregledni rad
https://doi.org/10.21857/y6zolb68jm
Jelčić’s Matoš and Strossmayer
Mirko Ćurić
; Društvo hrvatskih književnika, Ogranak Slavonsko-baranjsko-srijemski, Đakovo, Hrvatska
Sažetak
If Antun Gustav Matoš was one of the few to portray Strossmayer in his essays as a multidimensional person, then we can say that Dubravko Jelčić did something similar in the scientific sense. His Strossmayer is layered, and with his approach academician Jelčić showed that significant people must be approached primarily sine ira et studio. Jelčić claims that Strossmayer occupies a “small, but separate, even honorable place in terms of value in the work of the greatest Croatian writer at the turn of the century, A. G. Matoš.” Bishop Strossmayer has a similar place as an important reference figure in academician Jelčić’s scientific and editorial work, in which the Starčević-Strossmayer diptych predominates in the Matoš style. For Matoš, Starčević is a “genius of law and the past”, while Strossmayer is a “genius of the future and culture”. They complement each other almost ideally, striving for the same thing in different ways, and this is synthesized in a special way by Jelčić in the preface to Strossmayer’s first book in „Stoljeća hrvatske književnosti".
Ključne riječi
Dubravko Jelčić; Antun Gustav Matoš; Josip Juraj Strossmayer; Ante Starčević
Hrčak ID:
314210
URI
Datum izdavanja:
9.2.2024.
Posjeta: 518 *