Skoči na glavni sadržaj

Izvorni znanstveni članak

https://doi.org/10.53745/bs.94.4.6

The Role of Logic and Argumentation in Theological Texts

Ines Skelac ; Fakultet filozofije i religijskih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska
Marija Džinić ; Fakultet filozofije i religijskih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, Hrvatska


Puni tekst: hrvatski pdf 384 Kb

str. 641-655

preuzimanja: 18

citiraj


Sažetak

The paper analyses the specificities of argumentation in theological texts, underscoring how it differs from argumentation in other disciplines through its combination of faith-based claims and logical reasoning. Unlike other disciplines that frequently rely on empirical data and human cognition, theological texts base their arguments on sacred scriptures, tradition, and dogmas, which are regarded as divine revelations. The goal of theological argumentation is not only to confirm a claim or persuade a reader of a conclusion, but also to deepen the reader’s religious devotion. In theological argumentation, it is crucial to distinguish between doctrinal teachings based on the divine revelation from more speculative theological reflections, which offer additional insights but hold different authoritative statuses. This paper highlights the importance of sound, well-supported argumentation in theological texts. Within addition to theological knowledge, argumentation requires the application the rules of reasoning and the avoidance of logical fallacies. Properly structured argumentation in theological texts reinforces the significance of theology as a science and facilitates a deeper understanding and acceptance of religious truths. It promotes greater devotion to faith and helps defend theology against critiques, particularly those questioning its scientific rigor due to its reliance on faith-based premises. The text of Karl Rahner is presented as an example of the analysis of theological argumentation. His book Grace in Freedom illustrates how meticulous analysis and logical coherence can make theological arguments more accessible and comprehensible. Rahner utilizes doctrinal sources and philosophical discussions and anticipates counterarguments, making his arguments intellectually challenging and resistant to criticism. The paper advocates for recognizing well-argued theological texts as an essential element in defending theology as a rational discipline and paves the way for further research into the theological methodology and argumentation structure.

Ključne riječi

dogmas; informal logic; Karl Rahner; logical reasoning; theological argumentation.

Hrčak ID:

327365

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/327365

Datum izdavanja:

29.1.2025.

Podaci na drugim jezicima: hrvatski

Posjeta: 50 *