Preliminary communication
https://doi.org/10.32701/dp.26.1.3
Private Language in Philosophical Investigations: The Viability of Hintikkas’ Interpretation
Jure Zovko
; University of Zadar, Department of Philosophy, Zadar, Croatia
Mate Penava
orcid.org/0000-0003-4735-6533
; University of Zadar, Department of Philosophy, Zadar, Croatia
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze Jaakko and Merrill Hintikka’s interpretation of Wittgenstein’s arguments against epistemic privacy. The main focus of the paper is to explore their views on this issue and examine the connections between their argumentation and that of Saul Kripke to see to what extent these views coincide. The reason for comparing the said authors is that they all oppose the received view of the argument against private language, which claims that the discussion of private language begins with PI 243. In fact, these philosophers claim that Wittgenstein already discussed the issue of the impossibility of a private language in his rule–following reflections, especially in PI 201 and 202. We will also explore some drawbacks of the interpretation of Wittgenstein offered by the Hintikkas and attempt to provide an overall perspective of the viability of their position in relation to Wittgenstein’s argument against epistemic privacy.
Keywords
Ludwig Wittgenstein, rule–following, private language, intersubjectivity, Saul Kripke, the Hintikkas
Hrčak ID:
328449
URI
Publication date:
27.2.2025.
Visits: 802 *