Pregledni rad

https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20250114002267

Review of Life Cycle Assessment Studies of Sediment Stabilisation/Solidification Treatment

Boris Agarski orcid.org/0000-0002-7206-5714 ; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad, Serbia *
Djordje Vukelic orcid.org/0000-0003-2420-6778 ; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad, Serbia
Aleksandra Tubic orcid.org/0000-0001-7503-7754 ; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 3, Novi Sad, Serbia
Milos Seslija ; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad, Serbia
Mihaela Timofti orcid.org/0000-0003-2876-9500 ; University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, Faculty of Sciences and Environment, Department of Chemistry, Physics and Environment; REXDAN Research Infrastructure, Str. Domnească, nr. 111, Galati, Romania
Vesna Gvoic ; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad, Serbia
Miljana Prica ; University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 6, Novi Sad, Serbia

* Dopisni autor.

Sažetak

The aim of this paper is to review life cycle assessment studies on the stabilisation/solidification treatment of freshwater or marine sediments. First, the life cycle assessment studies on stabilisation/solidification treatment of sediments were reviewed on the Web of Science platform and eleven studies were selected. Secondly, the standardised phases of life cycle assessment were used as review criteria: Goal and Scope, Inventory Analysis, Life Cycle Impact Assessment, and Interpretation. The results of the review systematically showed information about the life cycle assessment phases and provided the similarities and differences. All studies reviewed had system boundaries from cradle to gate, but six studies did not include sediment dredging in the upstream life cycle stages. Ten of eleven studies used life cycle inventory databases to model background processes, and six studies reported the names of the datasets used. For the life cycle impact assessment methods, all studies used the CML, ReCiPe, and IMPACT 2002+ methods. In the interpretation phase, all studies included hotspot, contribution and scenario analyses, while sensitivity and uncertainty analyses were used in six out of eleven studies. The results of the review provide information that can be a good starting point for new research in this area.

Ključne riječi

life cycle assessment; sediment; solidification; stabilisation

Hrčak ID:

332987

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/332987

Datum izdavanja:

29.6.2025.

Posjeta: 964 *