Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.005

Failure to review STAT clinical laboratory requests and its economical impact

Enrique Rodriguez-Borja orcid.org/0000-0002-0339-6704 ; Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Celia Villalba-Martinez ; Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Esther Barba-Serrano ; Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Arturo Carratala-Calvo orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-7214 ; Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Abstract

Background: Failure to follow-up laboratory test results has been described as one of the major processes contributing to unsafe patient care. Currently, most of the laboratories do not know with certainty not only their rate of missed (or unreviewed) requests but the economical cost and impact that this issue implies. The aim of our study was to measure that rate and calculate the resulting costs.
Material and methods: In January 2015, we checked in our Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) for every emergency request from 1st July 2011 to 30th June 2014, if they had been reviewed by any allowed user or not. 319,064 requests were ordered during that period of time. Results were expressed as “ordered requests”, “missed requests” and its percentage. Additionally, total cost of missed requests was calculated in euros (€). “Non-productive days” were theorised (as the days producing requests that were not reviewed) based on these results.
Results: 7924 requests (2.5%) were never reviewed by clinicians. This represented a total cost of 203,039 € and 27 “non-productive” days in three years. Significant differences between inpatients, outpatients and emergency department as well as different emergencies units were found after application of statistical analysis.
Conclusions: In terms of resources, never reviewed or missed requests appear to be a not negligible problem for the clinical laboratory management. Electronic result delivery, with electronic endorsement to indicate follow-up of requests along with better systems of electronic requesting should be investigated as a way of improving patient outcomes and save unnecessary expenses.

Keywords

quality indicators; health care; extra-analytical phase; total quality management; clinical laboratory information systems

Hrčak ID:

153820

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/153820

Publication date:

15.2.2016.

Visits: 1.379 *