Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.017

Preanalytical external quality assessment of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine and CROQALM: finding undetected weak spots

Nora Nikolac orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-6309 ; University Department of Chemistry, Medical School University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia
Jasna Lenicek Krleza ; Department of laboratory diagnostics, Children’s hospital Zagreb, Croatia
Ana-Maria Simundic ; Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital “Sveti Duh”, Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: english pdf 197 Kb

page 131-143

downloads: 589

cite


Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this paper is to present results of first two years of preanalytical external quality assessment (EQA) in Croatia.
Materials and methods: This paper summarizes results from 6 rounds of preanalytical EQA during 2014-2016 in 161-175 Croatian laboratories (number ranged between cycles). EQA was designed as an online survey of the compliance with National recommendations for phlebotomy (NRP). Forty-seven questions in 5 categories are analyzed (materials and equipment, patient identification, patient preparation, sampling and storage). Additionally, preanalytical cases are presented. Overall performance scores (Question score (Qscore) for compliance with NRP and Case score (Cscore) for preanalytical cases) are calculated for each question/case as a proportion of laboratories with satisfactory procedure (x 100). Qscores and Cscores ? 70 were classified as acceptable (maximal score = 100).
Results: In investigation of compliance with NRP, acceptable Qscores were obtained for 34/47 questions. The lowest scores were observed for the availability of sterile disposable tourniquets (Qscore = 15) and safe-sharp needles (Qscore = 34), obtaining patients address as an identifier (Qscore = 21), using glycolysis inhibitor tubes for glucose concentration measurement (Qscore = 21) and verification of manufacturers declarations on temperature and time of storage (Qscore = 31). There was no statistically significant difference in overall Qscore according to different categories of phlebotomy procedures (P = 0.284). The results of preanalytical cases showed acceptable Cscore values for all cases (89-96).
Conclusion: First two years of preanalytical EQA showed good compliance with the NRP and excellent expertise in resolving complex preanalytical issues. Major critical spots are lack of availability of safe-sharp needles, disposable tourniquets and glucose inhibitor tubes.

Keywords

preanalytical phase; external quality assessment; laboratory error

Hrčak ID:

176480

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/176480

Publication date:

15.2.2017.

Visits: 1.624 *