Professional paper
https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey
Gamze Özkaptan Alptekin
Full text: croatian pdf 96 Kb
page 489-496
downloads: 674
cite
APA 6th Edition
Özkaptan Alptekin, G. (2017). Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey. Građevinar, 69 (06.), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
MLA 8th Edition
Özkaptan Alptekin, Gamze. "Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey." Građevinar, vol. 69, no. 06., 2017, pp. 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016. Accessed 12 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Özkaptan Alptekin, Gamze. "Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey." Građevinar 69, no. 06. (2017): 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
Harvard
Özkaptan Alptekin, G. (2017). 'Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey', Građevinar, 69(06.), pp. 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
Vancouver
Özkaptan Alptekin G. Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey. Građevinar [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 December 12];69(06.):489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
IEEE
G. Özkaptan Alptekin, "Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey", Građevinar, vol.69, no. 06., pp. 489-496, 2017. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
Full text: english pdf 88 Kb
page 489-496
downloads: 1.583
cite
APA 6th Edition
Özkaptan Alptekin, G. (2017). Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey. Građevinar, 69 (06.), 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
MLA 8th Edition
Özkaptan Alptekin, Gamze. "Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey." Građevinar, vol. 69, no. 06., 2017, pp. 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016. Accessed 12 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Özkaptan Alptekin, Gamze. "Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey." Građevinar 69, no. 06. (2017): 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
Harvard
Özkaptan Alptekin, G. (2017). 'Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey', Građevinar, 69(06.), pp. 489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
Vancouver
Özkaptan Alptekin G. Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey. Građevinar [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 December 12];69(06.):489-496. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
IEEE
G. Özkaptan Alptekin, "Comparison in terms of delays in the construction contracts used in Turkey", Građevinar, vol.69, no. 06., pp. 489-496, 2017. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1796.2016
Abstract
Developing countries offer a market opportunity for construction industry. Turkish construction market is one of the attractive ones, after Russia in the Middle East, because of quantitative and qualitative needs with regard to both structural and infrastructural projects. General Conditions of Construction Contracts (GCCC) are commonly used for public procurements in Turkey, while FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction are used less often. In this paper, GCCC is compared with FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction 1999, in terms of delays, in order to provide guidance to potential contractors.
Keywords
construction contracts; conditions of contracts; delay; FIDIC; public procurement; public procurement laws
Hrčak ID:
185039
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/185039
Publication date:
16.7.2017.
Article data in other languages:
croatian
Visits: 3.326
*
