Original scientific paper

Reflective Equilibrium: Justification without Intuitions

Christian Rettig ; Department of Political Science – University College London, London, UK

Abstract

Does the method of reflective equilibrium (henceforth, RE) involve ethical intuitions? If not, what are the so-called “considered judgments” invoked at the beginning of the process of reflective equilibrium? Contrary to the principal tendency in moral and political philosophy, I provide a negative answer to the first question. I hold that ethical intuitions are non-inferential beliefs. I then claim that RE does not involve ethical intuitions because its coherentist character rejects, by definition, any type of non-inferentiality. Concerning the second question above, I provide an answer that preserves the epistemological consistency of RE: considered judgments should be defined as inferential beliefs. The possibility of their inferential character relies on the role of background beliefs in the process of reflective equilibrium. In brief, I criticise and reformulate the standard interpretation of RE by claiming that it does not involve ethical intuitions but only inferential beliefs.

Keywords

Reflective equilibrium; intuitions; considered judgments; justification; foundationalism; coherentism

Hrčak ID:

187576

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/187576

Publication date:

15.6.2017.

Visits: 1.601 *