Original scientific paper

Mary’s Scientific Knowledge

Luca Malatesti ; University of Hull, United Kingdom

Abstract

Frank Jackson’s knowledge argument (KA) aims to prove, by means of a thought experiment concerning the hypothetical scientist Mary, that conscious experiences have non-physical properties, called qualia. Mary has complete scientific knowledge of colours and colour vision without having had any colour experience. The central intuition in the KA is that, by seeing colours, Mary will learn what it is like to have colour experiences. Therefore, her scientific knowledge is incomplete, and conscious experiences have qualia. In this paper I consider an objection to the KA raised by Daniel Dennett. He maintains that the KA is vitiated by Jackson’s account of Mary’s scientific knowledge. While endorsing this criticism, I will defend the plausibility and relevance of the type of strategy involved in the KA by offering an account of Mary’s scientific knowledge. This account involves formulating a reasonable and not immediately false version of the physicalist thesis with regard to colour experiences. Whether this version of the KA is successful against this type of physicalism is not investigated here.

Keywords

Conscious experience; experiences of colours; knowledge argument; physicalism; qualia

Hrčak ID:

21432

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/21432

Publication date:

24.4.2008.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 3.167 *