Other

https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.031001

Flushing of an intravenous catheter: a cause for unreliable laboratory results

Rutger C.C. Hengeveld ; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Maaike C. Gerards ; Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Bianca E. Olofsen ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Milan L. Ridderikhof ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Victor F.H.A. Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Peter A. Leenhouts ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Edmée C. van Dongen-Lases ; Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Introduction: Phlebotomy is an error-prone process in which mistakes are difficult to reveal. This case report describes the effect on laboratory
results originating from a blood sample collected in close proximity to an intravenous catheter.
Materials and methods: A 69-year-old male patient was referred to the Emergency department where pneumonia was suspected. Phlebotomy
was performed to collect blood samples to assess electrolytes, renal function, liver function, infection and haematological parameters.
Results: The laboratory analysis showed reduced potassium and calcium concentrations. To prevent life-threatening cardiac failure the clinician
decided to correct those electrolytes. Remarkably, the electrocardiogram showed no abnormalities corresponding to hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia.
This observation, in combination with an overall increase in laboratory parameters with the exception of sodium and chloride, led to the
suspicion of a preanalytical error. Retrospectively, an intravenous catheter was inserted in close proximity of the puncture place but no continuous
infusion was started prior to phlebotomy. However, the intravenous catheter was flushed with sodium chloride. Since potential other causes were
excluded, the flushing of the intravenous catheter with sodium chloride prior to phlebotomy was the most probable cause for the deviating laboratory
results and subsequently for the unnecessary potassium and calcium suppletion.
Conclusion: This case underlines the importance of caution in the interpretation of laboratory results obtained from specimens that are collected in
the proximity of an intravenous catheter, even in the absence of continuous infusion.

Keywords

preanalytical phase; phlebotomy; intravenous catheter

Hrčak ID:

226462

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/226462

Publication date:

15.10.2019.

Visits: 1.215 *