Original scientific paper
https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.22.65.7
Undecidable Literary Interpretations and Aesthetic Literary Value
Washington Morales Maciel
orcid.org/0000-0002-0343-909X
; University of the Republic, Uruguay
Abstract
Literature has been philosophically understood as a practice in the last thirty years, which involves “modes of utterance” and stances, not intrinsic textual properties. Thus, the place for semantics in philosophical inquiry has clearly diminished. Literary aesthetic appreciation has shifted its focus from aesthetic realism, based on the study of textual features, to ways of reading. Peter Lamarque’s concept of narrative opacity is a clear example of this shift. According to the philosophy of literature, literature, like any other art form, does not compel us to engage realistically with it. Against this trend, this paper argues for the distinction between two kinds of opacity, defending textual opacity as a necessary condition for literary opacity. In this sense, examples in literary criticism properly illustrate not a peripheral role of meaning in literary appreciation, but arbitrariness in interpretation, which involves semantic concerns. So the assumed interest in the specific ways in which literature embeds meaning in fictional narrative works.
Keywords
Literature; polysemy; opacity; aesthetic justifications.
Hrčak ID:
283595
URI
Publication date:
15.9.2022.
Visits: 1.032 *