Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

Islamic Wittgensteinian Fideism?

Edward Ryan Moad orcid id ; Qatar University

Full text: english pdf 304 Kb

page S4-28

downloads: 346



This paper examines recent deployments of Wittgenstein’s thought, by Mustafa (2018) and Asad (2020), in defense of the Islamic “traditionalism” of Ibn Taymiyyah and the Hanbali school. I will briefly summarize the key features of Wittgenstein’s thought crucial to this, and then examine their ramifications. I argue that Wittgenstein’s position actually undermines any claim to interpretive authority, whether of the “rationalist” or salafi “traditionalist” sort. Secondly, the approach to religious language most commonly associated with Wittgenstein—so-called “Wittgensteinian Fideism” may pose bigger problems for traditionalists than the influence of classical philosophy or “rationalist” theological responses to modern skeptical challenges.


Wittgenstein; Ibn Taymiyyah; Fideism; Hanbali; Salafi

Hrčak ID:



Publication date:


Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 774 *