Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.18.2.4

The Philosophy of Antiphilosophy in Islam

Imran Aijaz ; The University of Michigan-Dearborn


Full text: english pdf 302 Kb

page S3-24

downloads: 59

cite


Abstract

In this article, I will examine Aristotle’s protreptic argument for the necessity of philosophy as it was deployed by Al-Kindi. I will show how a Muslim critic of philosophy, primarily one who is aligned with the theological outlook of Ibn Hanbal, can reasonably reject the protreptic argument as Al-Kindi presents it. The argument can, however, be reworked in a way to circumvent common criticisms of it presented by Hanbalī-style opponents of philosophy. Indeed, I will argue that, once the argument is properly clarified with reference to what constitutes ‘philosophy’, its soundness is incontrovertible. In closing, I will briefly discuss why Muslim critics of philosophy need not see the protreptic argument as threatening, as the inevitability of philosophy does not necessitate a commitment to all sorts of philosophical positions, however problematic these may be for Islamic doctrine.

Keywords

Islam, philosophy, Islamic philosophy, antiphilosophy, protreptic argument, Aristotle, Al-Kindi, Ibn Hanbal

Hrčak ID:

287425

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/287425

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 127 *