Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.26362/20220202

Stage-theoretical naming and counting

H. E. Baber orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1430-7065 ; Department of Philosophy, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA 92110, USA


Full text: english pdf 682 Kb

page 151-172

downloads: 225

cite


Abstract

According to the stage view, ordinary objects are instantaneous stages, which “persist” by being counterpart-related to stages that exist at other times. In this paper, I consider the respective merits of current proposals for a stage-theoretical semantics of proper names of ordinary objects and sketch what I argue is a better alternative. On any stage-theoretical account, names of ordinary objects refer to stages. I argue that names should be understood as temporally flexible, referring indeterminately over stages that constitute an object’s history, and sketch a stagetheoretical semantics for names of ordinary objects that yields the intuitively correct results for reference and counting in both ordinary cases and extraordinary puzzle cases of fission.

Keywords

Stage theory; persistence; personal identity; fission; proper names

Hrčak ID:

287834

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/287834

Publication date:

21.12.2022.

Visits: 690 *