Skip to the main content

Other

https://doi.org/10.15836/ccar2022.283

Impella CP as a mechanical circulatory support of ventricular septal rupture; pros, cons and case report

Tomislava Bodrožić Džakić Poljak orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-7293-3972
Marin Pavlov orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-3962-2774
Aleksandar Blivajs orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-3404-3837
Ilko Vuksanović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-8647
Miroslav Raguž orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-8503
Irzal Hadžibegović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-3768-9134
Šime Manola orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-6444-2674


Full text: english pdf 145 Kb

page 283-283

downloads: 155

cite

Download JATS file


Abstract

Keywords

ventricular septal rupture; Impella CP; myocardial infarction; mechanical complication

Hrčak ID:

289791

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/289791

Publication date:

8.12.2022.

Visits: 474 *



Case report: 64-years-old female was admitted because of subacute myocardial infarction (MI) of inferoposterior wall. Upon admission she was pale, hypotensive, prostrated with loud systolic heart murmur. Due to characteristics of heart murmur, mechanical complication was suspected and echocardiogram showed large (28mm) mid inferoseptal ventricular rupture (VSR). Because of cardiogenic shock with elevated lactates, intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) was inserted, coronary angiography was performed and occluded mid part of right coronary artery was found. With mechanical circulatory support (MCS) by IABP patient was stable with little dose of vasopressors. Cardiac surgeons were consulted and they suggested to postpone the operation. Third day after admission patient deteriorated so we decide to upgrade MCS and switched IABP to Impella CP3.5 with great circulatory improvement. Patient needed no inotropes or vasopressors to maintain mean arterial blood pressure, serum lactate was within normal range and she had no clinical and radiographic signs of pulmonary congestion. Tenth day by admission, surgery was performed. VSR was fixed by huge patch. After surgery, she was getting better but unfortunately died of septic, gram negative, shock.

Discussion: Current guidelines recommends MCS, dominantly IABP in mechanical complications of acute MI. There are no recommendations for Impella CP usage. Ventricular septal defect is considered as relative contraindication for Impella insertion due to possibility of left-right shunt reversal (1,2). With careful and precise placement of Impella in left ventricle (LV) and watchful hemodynamic monitoring it can be avoided. We suggest Impella implantation in VSR if the right ventricular function is normal as Impella reduces afterload, pulmonary capillary pressure, unloads LV and reduces wall stress of both ventricles while maintain cardiac output. Possible, but real, negative side of it, would be reversal of shunt to right/left and suction of necrotic myocardial tissue with peripheral embolization.

LITERATURE

1 

Pahuja M, Schrage B, Westermann D, Basir MB, Garan AR, Burkhoff D. Hemodynamic Effects of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Ventricular Septal Defect. Circ Heart Fail. 2019 July;12(7):e005981. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.005981 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31296094

2 

Ronco D, Matteucci M, Ravaux JM, Marra S, Torchio F, Corazzari C, et al. Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Definitive Treatment in Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 24;14(10):1053–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.046 PubMed: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34016403


This display is generated from NISO JATS XML with jats-html.xsl. The XSLT engine is libxslt.