Skip to the main content

Review article

LIMITATIONS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT AS AN EFFECTIVE REMEDY IN PRACTICE AND LAW

Bardh Bokshi


Full text: english pdf 265 Kb

page 121-133

downloads: 191

cite


Abstract

Even though the conduct of fair proceedings is very important, it does not necessarily lead to a fair outcome of the given proceedings. Thus, fair proceedings must be complemented by a fair substantive outcome in order to render basic rights practical and effective. The reason for such a shortcoming of procedural fairness might be manifold, but it essentially boils down to the mechanical application of the law, excessive formalism in the application and interpretation of the law, and a failure to go beyond mere appearances and assess the realities of the situation complained of. In this paper, I expound on the role of the constitutional complaint as an effective remedy pertinent to individuals who have an arguable claim regarding a violation of their substantive rights guaranteed by the ECHR and the Constitution alike. This paper analyses a ruling of the Constitutional Court of Kosovo where it found a violation of the right to privacy and family life and the right to an effective remedy, notwithstanding the fair conduct of the proceedings. I will also show the impact of the relevant case law of the European Court on the approach and rationale of the Constitutional Court.

Keywords

constitutional complaint, effective legal remedy, fair proceedings, practical rights, substantive rights

Hrčak ID:

303977

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/303977

Publication date:

13.6.2023.

Visits: 593 *