Skip to the main content

Short communication, Note

https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2026.155

RCT-traps and psychiatric epistemology

Wolfgang Mastnak ; Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China; Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China *

* Corresponding author.


Full text: english pdf 539 Kb

page 155-158

downloads: 0

cite


Abstract

While (Cochrane-oriented) evidence based medicine favours RCTs and RCT-based meta-analyses, psychiatry also highlights the values of individualised medicine, complexity sciences and medical epistemology. In a similar way, meta-theoretical considerations put RCTs into perspective: (i) randomisation does not necessarily generate analogous samples, (ii) differences between normal and actual distributions impact on statistical outcomes, (iii) Likert scales may not produce interval data, which are prerequisite for statistical processing, (iv) medical data may possess dynamic characteristics, and (v) standardised research designs have to be revisited from a correspondence-theoretical point of view. To overcome typical flaws, statistical correction, reliable ways of sample splitting and dynamic
simulation models are in the ascendant.

Keywords

randomised controlled trials; medical mathematics; simulation models

Hrčak ID:

350268

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/350268

Publication date:

15.7.2026.

Visits: 0 *