Skip to the main content

European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, Vol. 6 No. 1, 2010.

Original scientific paper

Are psychiatric kinds real?

Helen Beebee
Nigel Sabbarton-Leary

Full text: english pdf 124 Kb

page 11-27

downloads: 1.038

cite

Abstract

The paper considers whether psychiatric kinds can be natural kinds and concludes that they can. This depends, however, on a particular conception of ‘natural kind’. We briefly describe and reject two standard accounts – what we call the ‘stipulative account’ (according to which apparently a priori criteria, such as the possession of intrinsic essences, are laid down for natural kindhood) and the ‘Kripkean account’ (according to which the natural kinds are just those kinds that obey Kripkean semantics). We then rehearse a more permissive account: Richard Boyd’s ‘homeostatic property cluster’ (HPC) account. We argue that psychiatric kinds can in principle count as natural kinds on the HPC account. Moreover, specific psychiatric kinds (Tourette’s, schizophrenia, etc.) can be natural kinds even if the category psychiatric disorder is not itself a natural kind.

Keywords

natural kind; psychiatric kind; homeostatic property cluster

Hrčak ID:

63453

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/63453

Publication date:

1.2.2010.

Visits: 2.244 *