Skip to the main content

Other

Multiple comparison analysis testing in ANOVA

Mary L. McHugh ; Department of Nursing, School of Health and Human Services, National University, San Diego, California, USA


Full text: english pdf 134 Kb

page 203-209

downloads: 6.776

cite


Abstract

The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test has long been an important tool for researchers conducting studies on multiple experimental groups and one or more control groups. However, ANOVA cannot provide detailed information on differences among the various study groups, or on complex combinations of study groups. To fully understand group differences in an ANOVA, researchers must conduct tests of the differences between particular pairs of experimental and control groups. Tests conducted on subsets of data tested previously in another analysis are called post hoc tests. A class of post hoc tests that provide this type of detailed information for ANOVA results are called “multiple comparison analysis” tests. The most commonly used multiple comparison analysis statistics include the following tests: Tukey, Newman-Keuls, Scheffee, Bonferroni and Dunnett. These statistical tools each have specific uses, advantages and disadvantages. Some are best used for testing theory while others are useful in generating new theory. Selection of the appropriate post hoc test will provide researchers with the most detailed information while limiting Type 1 errors due to alpha inflation.

Keywords

ANOVA; post hoc analysis; Bonferroni; Tukey; Scheffee

Hrčak ID:

72939

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/72939

Publication date:

15.10.2011.

Visits: 18.626 *