Original scientific paper

The Main Bone of Contention

Kent Bach ; San Francisco State University

Abstract

I enumerate the main disagreements between Devitt and me, and then elucidate the most fundamental one. It concerns what it takes to
refer to something. Devitt takes a liberal view on this, according to which a speaker’s having a certain object in mind and intending to refer to
it puts the hearer in a position to form singular thoughts about it. There is no requirement that the hearer have any independent access to the
object. My view is more restrictive, not allowing “reference borrowing” of the sort that Devitt apparently thinks referential uses of definite descriptions involve. For me, if the speaker has a certain object in mind and intends to refer the hearer to it, and the hearer recognizes this intention, that merely enables him to form a general thought. It does not enable him to form a singular thought about it himself.

Keywords

Attributive uses; definite descriptions; demonstratives; implicatures; referential uses

Hrčak ID:

93212

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/93212

Publication date:

30.10.2007.

Visits: 1.236 *