Meeting abstract
Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis
Gisbert Krekeler
Full text: croatian pdf 77 Kb
page 246-246
downloads: 453
cite
APA 6th Edition
Krekeler, G. (2005). Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 39 (3), 246-246. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/561
MLA 8th Edition
Krekeler, Gisbert. "Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 39, no. 3, 2005, pp. 246-246. https://hrcak.srce.hr/561. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krekeler, Gisbert. "Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis." Acta stomatologica Croatica 39, no. 3 (2005): 246-246. https://hrcak.srce.hr/561
Harvard
Krekeler, G. (2005). 'Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 39(3), pp. 246-246. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/561 (Accessed 23 December 2024)
Vancouver
Krekeler G. Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 December 23];39(3):246-246. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/561
IEEE
G. Krekeler, "Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.39, no. 3, pp. 246-246, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/561. [Accessed: 23 December 2024]
Full text: english pdf 77 Kb
page 246-246
downloads: 418
cite
APA 6th Edition
Krekeler, G. (2005). Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis. Acta stomatologica Croatica, 39 (3), 246-246. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/561
MLA 8th Edition
Krekeler, Gisbert. "Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis." Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol. 39, no. 3, 2005, pp. 246-246. https://hrcak.srce.hr/561. Accessed 23 Dec. 2024.
Chicago 17th Edition
Krekeler, Gisbert. "Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis." Acta stomatologica Croatica 39, no. 3 (2005): 246-246. https://hrcak.srce.hr/561
Harvard
Krekeler, G. (2005). 'Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis', Acta stomatologica Croatica, 39(3), pp. 246-246. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/561 (Accessed 23 December 2024)
Vancouver
Krekeler G. Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis. Acta stomatologica Croatica [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2024 December 23];39(3):246-246. Available from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/561
IEEE
G. Krekeler, "Implant-Borne (Fixed) vs Implant-Supported (Removable) Total Rehabilitation - Experience and Prognosis", Acta stomatologica Croatica, vol.39, no. 3, pp. 246-246, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://hrcak.srce.hr/561. [Accessed: 23 December 2024]
Abstract
Total toothloss causes a dramatic change in the alveolar bone. Deficits in the vertical and sagittal directions are a permanent challenge to the dentist as, they restrict the possibilities of treatment. The wish of the patient to have a fixed rehabilitation in understandable but often limited due to the local situation. Surgical procedures to improve the bonebed are extensive and costly. Full bridges are often from the esthetical and functional point od view disappointing. Removable bridges or gum-free dentures with very different retention-elements seem to be in many cases the more reliable solution. Clinical cases explain the problems.
Keywords
Hrčak ID:
561
URI
https://hrcak.srce.hr/561
Publication date:
15.12.2005.
Article data in other languages:
croatian
Visits: 1.873
*
