Skip to the main content

Other

Methodological difficulties of social psychology with regard to grudged human rights

Frane Franić
Ivan Tadin


Full text: croatian pdf 232 Kb

page 357-361

downloads: 493

cite


Abstract

The authors in this article point at methodological omissions of work
from social psychology, which wrongly concluded that religiosity and
national exclusivism present united dimension of a person. That wrongly
conclusion refers to human rights negatively. It is considered that religiosity influences to nationalism and ethnocentrism negatively.
The authors refer to objective approach to the question of religiosity
and that should be taken in consideration all important factors at
research. For this reason would be necessery, they say, team work, then that in teams should be membars of different opinions and convictions, theists and atheists. They complain at some attitudes in our country which look at faith extremely ideological, negatively.

Keywords

social psychology; human rights

Hrčak ID:

85827

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/85827

Publication date:

15.12.1988.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.422 *