Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

Glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis

Giuseppe Lippi orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-9523-9054 ; Unità Operativa Diagnostica Ematochimica, Dipartimento di Patologia e Medicina di Laboratorio, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
Camilla Mattiuzzi ; Servizio Governance Clinica, Ospedale di Trento, Trento, Italy
Ivan Comelli ; Unità Operativa Pronto Soccorso e Medicina d’Urgenza, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy
Gianfranco Cervellin ; Unità Operativa Pronto Soccorso e Medicina d’Urgenza, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy


Full text: english pdf 130 Kb

page 78-82

downloads: 584

cite


Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis is crucial for management of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Among innovative and promising biomarkers, the recent interest raised on glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB (GPBB) has prompted us to perform a meta-analysis of published studies.
Materials and methods: A systematic electronic search was carried out on PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar, with no date restriction, to retrieve all articles that have investigated the early diagnostic performance of GPBB in patients with suspected AMI, and directly reported or allowed calculation of sensitivity and specificity. A meta-analysis of the reported sensitivity and specificity of each study and pooled area under the curve (AUC) was then performed by random effect approach. Heterogeneity was assessed by I-square statistics.
Results: Eight studies were finally selected for analysis (941 subjects; 506 cases and 435 controls), with a high heterogeneity (I-squared, 86.3%). The resulting pooled estimates and 95% confidence interval were 0.854 (0.801-0.891) for sensitivity, 0.767 (0.713-0.815) for specificity, 0.826 (0.774-0.870) for negative predictive value, 0.802 (0.754-0.844) for positive predictive value, and 0.754 (0.602-0.907) for AUC. In those studies that have simultaneously assessed GPBB and a troponin immunoassay, the combination of these biomarkers did not significantly improve the performance of troponin alone.
Conclusion: GPBB does not meet the current requirements for an efficient diagnosis of AMI when used as a stand-alone test, whereas its combination with troponin merits further investigation in larger trials.

Keywords

myocardial infarction; ischemic heart disease; glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB; GPBB

Hrčak ID:

97247

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/97247

Publication date:

15.2.2013.

Visits: 1.424 *