Review article

In Favour of the Inductive Method in Homilies

Ivan Antunović ; Faculty of Philosophy of the Society of Jesus in Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Ivan Petrović ; Catholic Faculty of Theology of the University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Abstract

The ancient understanding of the homily as a close conversation directed towards the community is the authors’ starting point in this article. One of the characteristic features of such a homily is to be found in the documents of the Second Vatican Council, particularly Presbyterorum Ordinis, and in the documents of Pope Benedict XVI, Sacramentum Caritatis and Verbum Domini which make mention of avoiding “general and abstract” homilies. The American Bishops’ document, “Fulfilled in Your Hearing,” is cited by the authors as stressing the importance that the homily be concrete. Two methods may be used in shaping a homily: the deductive and the inductive. Their arguments purport that the deductive method is characterised by “the general and abstract” homily. They argue that if the “general and abstract” homily, which is mentioned in the documents, is to be avoided, the inductive method is implied. The arguments for their thesis are supported by the characteristic features of the homily and the inductive method per se.

Keywords

inductive method; homily; general and abstract homily; preaching; The Second Vatican Council; Benedict XVI

Hrčak ID:

103702

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/103702

Publication date:

10.6.2013.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 1.265 *