Original scientific paper
THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE DEMOCRATIC STATE INTO THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATE
Davor Rodin
; Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Abstract
The author analyses Schmitt’s and Luhmann’s theory of democracy and the constitutional state. By comparing them, he concludes that Schmitt’s critique of the democratic pluralistic state has ended in the theory of direct or plebiscitary democracy in which the constitution is subject to an unpredictable will of political majority which can change it wilfully in line with the power relations. Luhmann, on the other hand, starts from the assumption of the separation between law and politics and builds his concept of the constitutional state on the bipolar differentiation and the mutual checks between law and politics. The author concludes that Luhmann does not give up on Hobbes’ pessimistic conviction that human nature is bestial; he only offers a different strategy for the coexistence of cultured savages.
Keywords
Hrčak ID:
105643
URI
Publication date:
16.1.1998.
Visits: 913 *