Original scientific paper

The Preoccupation and Crisis of Analytic Philosophy

Michael Losonsky

Abstract

I propose to reconsider Gilbert Ryle’s thesis in 1956 in his introduction to The Revolution of Philosophy that “the story of twentieth-century philosophy is very largely the story of this notion of sense or meaning” and, as he writes elsewhere, the “preoccupation with the theory of meaning is the occupational disease of twentieth-century Anglo-Saxon and Austrian philoso- phy.” Ryle maintains that this preoccupation demar- cates analytic philosophy from its predecessors and that it gave philosophy a set of academic credentials as a rigorous discipline with its own domain and method. I will maintain that Ryle, with some minor qualifica- tions, was correct in his assessment of the nature of analytic philosophy at that time, and I will argue that the next 50 years continued to be, very largely, the story of meaning, exemplified by the groundbreaking work of Rawls and Kripke. However, I argue that this work also contains the seeds that contributed to the emergence of philosophies that represent a significant departure from analytic philosophy.

Keywords

analytic philosophy; logic; meaning; naturalism; Ryle; Rawls; Kripke; 20th-century philosophy

Hrčak ID:

137701

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/137701

Publication date:

1.12.2014.

Visits: 1.336 *