Skip to the main content

Professional paper

Practice of the Supreme Court of the USA Regarding the "Commerce Clause" - Seismograph of Federal Changes

Ana Horvat


Full text: croatian pdf 145 Kb

page 95-124

downloads: 2.628

cite


Abstract

The author focuses on the Commerce Clause, a provision within the United States’ Constitution that provides the federal government with regulatory authority over interstate commerce. She considers changes in the Supreme Court’s practice, caused by the adaptation of law to changing economic climate as well as to (politically motivated) conceptual changes in models of federalism. Across three phases of the selected Court’s jurisprudence (the ‘early years’ (1824-1935), ‘New Deal and the civil rights’ struggle (1935- 1986) and the ‘Rehnquist Court era’ (1986-2005)), the author follows the link between the evolution of the Clause’s interpretation and the shift in models of federalism: from the domination of states’ rights, across dual federalism, to centralized federalism. She also touches upon the judicially created reverse side of the Clause, its ‘dormant’ counterpart,as well as the Court’s jurisprudence regarding the 21st Amendment to the United States Constitution as a signifi cant exception to the interpretation of the Commerce Clause.

Keywords

Commerce Clause; federalism; Supreme Court; “dormant” Commerce Clause; 21st Amendment

Hrčak ID:

13295

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/13295

Publication date:

23.5.2007.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 3.456 *