Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.3935/ljsr.v22i1.83

RESTORATIVNA PRAVDA I RECIDIVIZAM: ISTRAŽIVANJE UTJECAJA ŽRTVINOG ODABIRA RAZINE ANGAŽIRANOSTI

Nadia Wager ; University of Bedfordshire, United Kingdom
Ciaran OKeeffe ; Buckinghamshire New University, United Kingdom
Andrew Bates ; Thames Valley Probation, United Kingdom
Gooff Emerson ; Thames Valley Probation, United Kingdom


Full text: english pdf 320 Kb

page 61-80

downloads: 919

cite


Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of offering victims choice in their level of engagement with restorative justice interventions. Consequently, this study compared the expected risk for reconviction, calculated using the Offender Group Reconviction Scale and actual reconviction rates for completers and non-completers of three different restorative justice (RJ) initiatives: conference, letter of apology and victim-empathy work. Where reconvictions were evident the comparative level of harm between the initial and subsequent offences was examined. This was a risk-band analysis of 253 offenders who had received an RJ sentence between September 2007 and September 2011. Data analysis began after September 2012, to allow at least a one-year follow-up. The analyses revealed statistically significant differences between expected and actual reconviction rates for all three interventions. The choice offered to victims regarding their degree of involvement in the RJ sentence appears to do no harm; indeed it is still associated with lower rates of reconviction and a relatively high likelihood of a reduction in harm where reoffending occurs.

Keywords

restorative justice; risk-band analysis; victim preference; reconviction harm-reduction

Hrčak ID:

139977

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/139977

Publication date:

1.6.2015.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.210 *