Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

Utilitarianism and Moral Integrity: How Evolutionary Psychology Undermines Our Moral Intuitions

Ivan Cerovac orcid id orcid.org/0000-0003-3416-5295 ; University of Trieste – Department of Philosophy, Piazzale Europa 1, 34127 Trieste, Italy


Full text: english pdf 91 Kb

page 193-205

downloads: 4.804

cite


Abstract

This paper discuses Bernard Williams’ argument according to which utilitarianism is a bad moral theory because, by requiring us to reject conscience and our moral emotions in favour of the “lesser of evils”, it violates our moral integrity, itself a deep moral ideal. I discuss the implications of this objection, as well as the answer offered by Peter Railton. He claims that utilitarianism should respect (and not violate or reject) our conscience and moral emotions because, by violating our integrity for the best consequences, we would become demotivated and unable to act in the long run, and would thus decrease overall utility. This paper questions whether Railton’s solution adequately answers Williams’ objection, and argues that a possible answer should be looked for in recent studies in evolutionary psychology and in the very origin of our moral emotions.

Keywords

Consequentialism; evolutionary psychology; moral integrity; moral intuitions; utilitarianism

Hrčak ID:

150932

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/150932

Publication date:

31.12.2015.

Visits: 6.082 *