Original scientific paper

Linguistic Intuitions: In Defense of "Ordinarism"

Michel Devitt

Abstract

The received view in Chomskian linguistics is that linguistic intuitions are the product of a linguistic competence residing in a sub-central module of the mind. In Ignorance of Language I rejected this “Voice of Competence” view (“VoC”), and gave an answer of my own. I argued that intuitions are empirical theory-laden central-processor responses to phenomena. This led to an exchange with Nenad Miščević in which he defended VoC. Miščević has since returned to the issue, criticizing my sort of view, which he labels “ordinarism”. Dunja Jutronić has already given an excellent response to these criticisms. I focus on revising and developing my view further. I emphasize that a person’s linguistic intuitions can be immediate perceptual judgments that do not arise from any conscious and deliberate exercise of her own competence. Should she feel the need for such an exercise, she is likely to begin with an understanding test not a production one. The mental processes involved in these deliberate tests are not aptly described as “simulations” of linguistic usage.

Keywords

linguistic usage; Voice of Competence; Modest Explanation; theory-laden; simulation; the understanding test; the production test

Hrčak ID:

165993

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/165993

Publication date:

5.5.2016.

Visits: 933 *