Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.7.14.9

Tweeting on Catalonia’s Independence: The Dynamics of Political Discussion and Group Polarisation

Joan Balcells orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-1915 ; Faculty of Law and Political Science, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Albert Padró-Solanet orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-8242-2383 ; Faculty of Law and Political Science, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain


Full text: english pdf 721 Kb

page 124-140

downloads: 1.040

cite


Abstract

This article provides evidence in favour of social media serving as facilitators of public deliberation, in contrast with the hypothesis that emphasises the dominance of the “echo chamber” effect. It focuses on conversational interactions on Twitter between supporters from opposite sides in a potentially highly polarised political issue, i.e. the debate on the independence of Catalonia, which is used as a case study. Methodologically we rely on a random sample of communications on the Twitter reply network, involving for and against independence supporters. Remarkably, despite the tendency of forming homophilic networks, we find that communication across political lines is relatively frequent. Furthermore, heterogeneous conversations (where opposing sides are engaged in a dialogue) tend to be significantly longer than homogenous ones (where all participants share the same view), which can be seen as a sign of genuine deliberation based on reasonably exchanging arguments between competing viewpoints.

Keywords

social media; Twitter; public opinion; deliberation; polarisation

Hrčak ID:

171182

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/171182

Publication date:

15.12.2016.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.982 *