Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2014.974916

The superiority of FCFF over EVA and FCFE in capital budgeting

Paweł Mielcarz
Franjo Mlinarič


Full text: english pdf 418 Kb

page 559-572

downloads: 1.621

cite


Abstract

Misapplication and misinterpretation of capital budgeting techniques can lead to serious capital allocation and capital structure problems. Mainstream literature suggests at least ten approaches for free cash flow and discount rate estimation (leading to the same net present value – NPV) but their benefits vary a lot. We emphasise the application risks when using these techniques without considering the cost of capital for the whole company, thus leading to value decreasing investment decisions. A comparative analysis with a classical free cash flow to equity (FCFE) and economic value added (EVA) methodology will make a strong case for free cash flow to firm
(FCFF) as the most efficient approach. We also shed additional light on the main risks associated with the FCFE technique and project-based weighted average cost of capital (WACC) in the capital budgeting process.

Keywords

capital budgeting; valuation; FCFF; FCFE; EVA; project WACC

Hrčak ID:

171345

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/171345

Publication date:

20.12.2014.

Visits: 3.597 *