Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.17.1.3

Models of Deconcentrated Performance of State Administration Tasks in Post-Socialist Countries

Iva Lopižić orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-1157-0602 ; Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb


Full text: croatian pdf 169 Kb

page 81-106

downloads: 1.165

cite


Abstract

The author develops models of how state administration tasks are performed within a particular state: the delegated affairs model, the functionally fragmented model, the personally integrated model, and the organisational integration model. In order to examine their analytical validity, a theoretical description of the models is accompanied by an overview of the territorial state administration in post-socialist countries that became EU members in 2004 and 2007, and which had previously been characterised by a dense network of territorial state administration. The models are differentiated by the level of integration of state bodies within the territorial unit. In the delegated affairs model, there are no state administrative bodies in the territory and administration tasks are carried out by local self-government units. This model is adopted in the Czech Republic. In the functionally fragmented model, state administration tasks are carried out by the territorial administrative units of central state bodies that operate separately in the territory. This model is adopted in Latvia and Lithuania. In the personally integrated model, the central state
has its own representative in the territory (e.g. prefect, governor, voivode, or king’s commissioner), who has certain powers in relation to the territorial administrative units, and thus the territorial units are more or less integrated in performing state administration tasks within the same territorial unit. This model is adopted in the majority of post-socialist countries (Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, and Romania). In
the organisational integration model, all state administration tasks are performed by a single territorial state body. This model is adopted in Hungary, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Since these countries had to develop local self-government capacities in order to become EU members, it is expected that trends in the institutional development of their territorial state administration might indicate a relationship
between the growth of local capacities and the applied organisational model of territorial state administration. The conclusions are interpreted in the light of the development of territorial state administration in Croatia.

Keywords

territorial state administration; delegated affairs; territorial state bodies and units; state territorial representatives; deconcentration; post-socialist countries

Hrčak ID:

178722

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/178722

Publication date:

29.3.2017.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.640 *