Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.17559/TV-20160508131905

A multi-criteria assessment of the p-median, maximal coverage and p-center location models

Mumtaz Karatas orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-6287-3216 ; Department of Industrial Engineering, Turkish Naval Academy, Istanbul, 34942, Turkey
Nasuh Razi ; Institute of Naval Science and Engineering, Turkish Naval Academy, Istanbul, 34942, Turkey
Hakan Tozan ; School of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, 34810, Turkey


Full text: croatian pdf 523 Kb

page 399-407

downloads: 1.125

cite

Full text: english pdf 523 Kb

page 399-407

downloads: 373

cite


Abstract

Location problems consider locating facilities with the objective of finding their best locations. In most real world problems, it is common that a demand node is required to be covered with multiple facilities in order to ensure a backup supply. The backup supply is necessary especially for public or emergency service location problems where a covered demand may not be serviced if it’s designated facility is engaged serving other demands. In this study we consider three classic location models, i.e. p-median, maximal coverage and p-center, and compare their performances with respect to seven decision criteria under Q-coverage requirement. For this purpose, we generate multiple problem instances and solve each instance with the three models for different Q-values. Our numerical results reveal the pros and cons of each model to assist decision makers in determining the most promising model with respect to each assessment criteria.

Keywords

backup coverage; facility location; maximal coverage; p-center; p-median

Hrčak ID:

186082

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/186082

Publication date:

2.9.2017.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 2.927 *