Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0017

Preserving ‘Great Power Status’: The Complex Case of the British Intervention in the Falklands (1982)

Matthieu Grandpierron orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-2455 ; Ecole Polytechnique, University Paris-Saclay and the University of Ottawa


Full text: croatian pdf 1.120 Kb

page 127-156

downloads: 1.436

cite

Full text: english pdf 1.120 Kb

page 127-156

downloads: 470

cite


Abstract

This article aims to examine the importance of an often overlooked argument when it comes to explaining why great powers go to war against a weaker actor. This argument involves great power status considerations. The article argues that states care deeply about their status, especially states which are current and former great powers, and would opt to go to war to preserve this status even if the political and military consequences of such intervention are negligible to objective observers. To illustrate this argument, I will be looking at why the British decided to reestablish their sovereignty over the Falklands in 1982. The empirical part of the analysis is based on formerly secret documents declassified by the British government. This qualitative primary analysis of British documents provides new insights about the crisis and suggests that status considerations played a large role in the British decision to re-conquer the Falklands.

Keywords

great powers; status; recognition; status perception; United Kingdom; Falkland Islands

Hrčak ID:

187703

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/187703

Publication date:

20.9.2017.

Article data in other languages: english

Visits: 3.016 *