Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.31820/ejap.13.2.3

Saving the Ship

John Biro ; University of Florida


Full text: english pdf 165 Kb

page 43-54

downloads: 442

cite


Abstract

In defending the startling claim that that there are no artifacts, indeed, no inanimate material objects of the familiar sort, Peter van Inwagen has argued that truths about such putative objects can be paraphrased as truths that do not make essential reference to them and that we should endorse only the ontological commitments of the paraphrase. In this note I argue that the paraphrases van Inwagen recommends cannot meet his condition. Read one way, they lose us some truths. Read another, they entail the existence of the very objects they are supposed to rid us of. However, we need not share van Inwagen's distaste for the latter: to say that they exist is not to say that anything exists in addition to the simples composing them.

Keywords

van Invagen; paraphrase; composites; simples

Hrčak ID:

203341

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/203341

Publication date:

9.7.2018.

Visits: 1.260 *