Skip to the main content

Review article

Alternative Models for Toxicity Testing of Xenobiotics

Jasna Kniewald
Ivana Kmetič
Višnja Gaurina-Srček
Zlatko Kniewald


Full text: english pdf 91 Kb

page 195-204

downloads: 1.986

cite


Abstract

The alternatives to whole-animal testing include endpoint assays, cell and tissue cultures, use of tissue slices, toxicokinetic modelling, and structure-activity relationships and databases. The use of in vitro systems (subcellular fractions, cell lines, primary cell cultures, tissue slices, organ cultures, etc.) as research tools in toxicology is widespread. In the past few years, the apoptosis phenomena were followed by very precise intracellular changes where, through programmed cell death, a cell can be removed from a population. The in vitro systems are ideally suited for investigations of the molecular, cellular and physiological mechanisms of chemically induced toxicity, which cannot readily be studied in vivo for known target organ and target species toxicity studies and for answering specific questions about toxic effects. The main justification for developing in vitro toxicity tests is that they will make toxicology a more scientifically based practice. It is increasingly apparent that the development and incorporation of stepwise testing strategies, combining experimental data from a range of alternative methods (physicochemical techniques, quantitative structure-activity relationships - QSAR, metabolic and kinetic modelling and in vitro tests), provide the most advanced way to predict toxicity, reducing at the same time the number of laboratory animals used for testing.

Keywords

alternative methods; biomarkers; in vitro methods; predicting toxic hazard; validation

Hrčak ID:

149

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/149

Publication date:

23.5.2005.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 3.604 *