Skip to the main content

Original scientific paper

https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.69.56.10

Differentiating Between the Legal Principles of Contribution of the Injured Party to His Own Injury and Apportioned Liability

Dijana Vragović orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-3025-0698 ; County Court in Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia


Full text: croatian pdf 336 Kb

page 871-902

downloads: 2.907

cite


Abstract

There is a need to distinguish, both in legal theory and practice, two different legal principles - contribution of the injured party to his own injury and apportioned liability, formerly defined in Article 192 of the Civil Obligations Act (1978) and currently in Article 1092 of the Civil Obligations Act (2005). It is important to use the precise terminology when applying the legal principles, not only for the sake of using accurate nomenclature per se, but also in order to ensure that the correct requirements are identified. In this article, the author provides a review of recent Croatian case law, as well as of the academic discussion of this topic. Finally, the author makes a conclusion about the correct terminology and requirements for applying the legal principle of contribution of the injured party to his own injury when discussing liability for damage and compensation reduction.

Keywords

contribution of the injured party; apportioned liability; volenti non fit iniuria; compensation of damage; indirect victims

Hrčak ID:

233813

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/233813

Publication date:

31.1.2020.

Article data in other languages: croatian

Visits: 4.153 *