Skip to the main content

Review article

https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2020.7.1.7

THE EU AND RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: CASE STUDIES ON THE EU’S RESPONSE TO MASS ATROCITIES IN LIBYA, SOUTH SUDAN AND MYANMAR

Darina Dvornichenko orcid id orcid.org/0000-0002-9357-0226 ; National University “Odessa Maritime Academy” Maritime Law Department, Ukraine
Vadym Barskyy orcid id orcid.org/0000-0001-7521-284X ; Odessa I.I. Mechnikov National University Civil Law Department, Ukraine


Full text: english pdf 283 Kb

page 117-138

downloads: 738

cite


Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of the European Union (EU) approach towards the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The paper refers to the case study method used to assess the EU’s capacity to respond adequately to the particular mass atrocity cases – Libya, South Sudan, and Myanmar. The methodology of the paper is based on a discursive analytical approach, which requires a thorough examination of the official declarations, statements, and resolutions adopted by the EU in the scope of EU foreign and security policy. The article focuses on clear distinctions between the EU’s approach to these cases, reveals several weaknesses and hidden reputational risks in the EU’s response to mass atrocity situations as well as offers several recommendations on how to overcome identified deficiencies.

Keywords

European Union; EU; mass atrocities; responsibility to protect; Libya; Myanmar; South Sudan

Hrčak ID:

240327

URI

https://hrcak.srce.hr/240327

Publication date:

30.6.2020.

Visits: 2.017 *